<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16850" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7><FONT id=role_document
face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV>Right after I wrote that a picture of a person in body paint is OK but the
actual person would not be, I read RMB's post:</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000
size=2>
<DIV><BR>>>The only reason why the video is of interest is that it taps
into<BR>prurient thoughts. Intentionally causing these kinds of hirhurim
is<BR>assur, regardless of whether deft camera placement avoids
actually<BR>showing ervah. <<</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I saw immediately that RMB was right and was surprised at myself for
not having realized something so obvious. It could be that what is
prurient to a man might be merely amusing to a woman, so maybe women could watch
the safety video and then tell their husbands the safety instructions.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV></FONT><FONT lang=0 face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF"
PTSIZE="10"><B>--Toby
Katz<BR>==========<BR><BR><BR><BR>_____________________</B></FONT></DIV></DIV></FONT><DIV CLASS="aol_ad_footer" ID="1a80da59f494d4247c5bd7b913ac9147"><br/><font style="color:black;font:normal 10pt arial,san-serif;"> <hr style="margin-top:10px"/><A HREF=http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222466512x1201463496/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Faltfarm.mediaplex.com%2Fad%2Fck%2F12309%2D81939%2D1629%2D3>Dell Studio XPS Desktop: Save up to $400 - Limited Time Offer</A></font></DIV></BODY></HTML>