<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:06 AM, Micha Berger <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:micha@aishdas.org">micha@aishdas.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 03:39:32AM +0000, <a href="mailto:rabbirichwolpoe@gmail.com">rabbirichwolpoe@gmail.com</a> wrote:<br>
: What is the proposed alternative to oats in the 5 species?<br>
<br>
Tir'u baTov!<br>
-Micha<br>
<br>
--</blockquote></div><br>Given: Yeast isn't chameitz <br><br>Then what I was suggesting in an earlier post is:<br>Could GLUTEN be the common denominator of the species that produce Chameitz?.<br><br>And if so what would this imply about the "oat" controversy?<br>
<br>IOW if "Oats" fails as a form of barley/wheat, could it passanyway because after all it has a significant amount of Gluten?<br><br>Furthermore is that Rashi's position?<br>And therefore could this be Chazal's position? <br>
<br><br>-- <br>Kol Tuv - Best Regards,<br>RabbiRichWolpoe@Gmail.com<br>see: <a href="http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/">http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/</a><br><a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nishma-Minhag/">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nishma-Minhag/</a><br>
<br>