<br><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:23 PM, hankman <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:salman@videotron.ca">salman@videotron.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div bgcolor="#ffffff">
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">Finally, RYZ wrote:</font></div>
<div class="im">
<div>see Hakdomas HaRambam to Perek Chelek where he explains the 4 differences<br>between the Nvuoh of Moshe RO"H and other nvi'im, without mentioning such an<br>obvious difference</div>
<div> </div></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">CM comments:</font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">I am not sure what additional difference you mean? The clarity of the vision is part of the difference of "aspaklaria hameira."</font></div></div></blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>My point was that if there would be a Metzius that a Novi can misinterpert a Nvuoh due to lack of clarity, the Rambam would have to say that, since he does not it is poshut that it can't be, (this is a Rayo not a Stira to what you said). </div>
<div> </div>
<div>WRT Vyeda Ma Hu IMHO it includes everything in that Nvuoh unless specified in the Nvuoh otherwise, why he didn't give over it's meaning is Bdugma to what the Rambam says at the end of Halacha 3, that times he reveals moshol and Pisron times just one of the two, perhaps times he only gives the Pisron to part of the Moshol (although one can argue why the Rambam doesn't write it).</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Kol Tuv,</div>
<div>Yitzchok Zirkind</div></div>