<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>In response to the comments of RHB and RRRW below
it has been my understanding (Although I can not cite a specific mekor) that the
understanding by a Novi of his Nevuha is in fact infallible. The infallibility
stems from the infallibility of Hashem to communicate the exact message he
wishes to impart to the Novi, not metsad the Novi himself.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Kol Tuv</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Chaim Manaster</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>RHB<BR>> 2. Even if Avraham was a true Novi, do/did Novis ever make
(potentially<BR>> fatal or otherwise) mistakes?<BR><BR><FONT face=Arial
size=2>RRRW wrote:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>And if a judge convicts someone to die is his word law? - Or do we
say<BR>that since "he is not infallible" we cannot execute?<BR><BR>This
conflation of authority with infallibilty sounds like a<BR>quasi-anarchistic
call to dismiss all authority since humans are<BR>admittedly
fallible!<BR></DIV></BODY></HTML>