<div dir="ltr"><div>R' David Bannett wrote:</div>
<div>> That the b'rakha beginning V'lirushalayim (Sefaradim: Tishkon) and the one<br>> after it, that begins with Et tzemach were one brakha in E"Y is attested<br>> to also by the nusach E"Y found in the geniza and old manuscripts.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>On that note, those who say the kerovah ("krovetz") on Purim will note that there is no section for the berakhah of "es tzemach," as the kerovah was initially composed for nusach Eretz Yisrael.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Shavua tov,</div>
<div>D.C.</div></div>