<div dir="ltr">On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Arie Folger <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:afolger@aishdas.org">afolger@aishdas.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
RMB posted about the question of interpreting haMelekh haMishpat, pointing out<br>
that according to Rashi, that isn't proper usage, which would be Melekh<br>
haMishpat.<br>
<br>
Interestingly enough, Arutz7 just publish a photo of a fragment of a<br>
sarcofagus or of an ossuary of the son of a kohen gadol, and clearly visible<br>
are the words hakohen hagadol.<br>
</blockquote></div><br>"Hakkohen haggadol" is parallel to "hammelech hakkadosh", not to "hammelech hammishpat".<br></div>