<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:05 AM, D&E-H Bannett <<a href="mailto:dbnet@zahav.net.il">dbnet@zahav.net.il</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Re: <<9-10 parsha breaks as in the Masoretic text<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
Then you can make a case for 4and 6.<br></div>
I.E. Lo sachmod is TWO and anochi and Lo Yihye are really one [iow NO BREAK]>><br>
<br>
Doesn't the idea of 9 dibros seem weird?<br>
<br>
See Breuer who shows that that breakdown that joins the first two dibrot is an error.<br>
<br>
In fact Heidenheim made the correction of separating the first dibber in taam elyon some 200 years ago. Breuer makes an additional correction and has an explanation of how the errors developed stage by stage over the years.<br>
<br>
So, despite most "regular" chamashim, the masoretic text of ta'am elyon had and should have 10 dibrot and not nine.<br>
<br>
<br>
David</blockquote></div><br>100% agreed. As a fan of Heidenheim etc.<br><br>But if you IGNORE the T'amim/Neginnos and focus upon parsha breaks, there are indeed TEN but not the Ten we know and love, but another TEN, with 2 lo sachmods! <br>
<br>And the parsha breaks are AFAIK are also part of the Mosorretic text. <br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Kol Tuv / Best Regards,<br>RabbiRichWolpoe@Gmail.com<br>see: <a href="http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/">http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/</a>