<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Jacob Sasson <<a href="mailto:jsasson@gmail.com">jsasson@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
>>The problem?
The Mishan/Haggadah with the questions equate year 'round teh eating of
Hametz uMatza - which presupposes that they are equally valid for kevia's
S'eduha all year Round. FWI I actually heard this quoted from a Sephardic
Hacham.
<br><br>Rabbi Rich Wolpoe wonders why Sephardim say Mezonot on Matza. The real question is why anyone would say hamotzi on matza.<br><br>The halacha, as codified by the Shulchan Aruch, proscribes a mezonot for "Pat Haba'a Bekisnin". Three definitions are given for PH"B, one of which is a cracker. In principle, Matza is a cracker and the default rule on PHB is that they require a mezonot. Ashkenazim say hamotzi on Matza only because it is normally eaten as a meal. Thus, matza is an exception to the PHB rule but is not lechem in and of itself. To put it in Brisker terms, Matza does not have a "chalos shem pas." <br>
<br>The "problem" of comparing hametz and matza in the mishna/haggada is only a problem if you assume that the "matza" referred to is the same cracker like matza eaten today. It was not. Traditionally, matza was made of unleavened dough. Many sephardim (myself included) still eat this "soft matza" on Pesach, which explains the comparison between hametz and matza quite well. They are distinguished only by the fact that the matza didn't have time to rise. <br>
<br>One of the obligations on Pesach is the eating of the korech "sandwhich." Korech means to "fold". The real questions are how ashkenazim "fold" their matza and when the cracker we call matza replaced the original "soft" matza.<br>
<font color="#888888">
<br>Jacob<br><br><br>
</font></blockquote></div>I heard this in the name of one of your family members.<br><br>I hear your point, that the original Matzah was softer and that today's matzah is hard like a cracker. But that does not explain the use of lechem oni as the reason. Perhaps I heard the WRONG reason for saying mezonos<br>
<br>The Rambam refers to Matzah as a Rekik - meaning Wafer. It does not seem at least in HIS day to have been soft. AIUI it would seem that MOST of the Menachos were both hard and matzah. The Lechem Hapanim seems to have been quite firm and not soft or pliable at all. And this thread is related to the Lechem hapanim being matza. If the lechem hapanim were indeed soft, it would not have stayed in its hmold very well.<br>
<br>The fact that lechem hapanim was both Matza and called Lechem is part of the proof for this. Now it IS possible that lechem hapanim was firm but still soft somehow and not a true cracker. I don't know for sure. It certainly was not flat it was shaped sort of like a "U"<br>
<br>Ashkenazic Cracker Matza is based upon a Humra to make it as dry as possible and as thoroughly baked as possible. I think this Humra makes sense because today's matza is very unlikely to have the concern of unbaked flour that plagued Matzos of earlier generations. AISI this humra leads us safely to being lenient on matzo shruya because the possibility of unbaked flour in our hard crackers is indeed minimal.<br>
<br>At any rate, Pas Habba bekisnin IS hamotzi any time one is kovei'a a se'udah upon it. Thus, crackers WOULD be hamotzi when used for kevi'as se'udah anyway. So the only question would be upon the issue ofsnacking on matzah.<br>
<br>Tangentially, AISI, any time one is kovei'a a s'udah on Shabbas would convert a pas habba bekisnin into Hamotzi. That is why matzah Ashira is hamozi for any se'udah on Shabbos even though we might say mezonos on it during the week as a snack. This is a form of Achshevei. the requirement of Kevi'as se'udah on Shabbos PROMOTES the matzah ashira from pas habba beksinin mezonos to hamozi merely by the context of a Sahbbos Se'udah.<br>
<br>The only problem I have is having crackers at our s-called "kiddushes" on Shsbbos after services. This actually cannot work in my system [i.e I would required hamotzi] and I am told the GRA insisted on hamotzi davka after Kiddush. This WAS true of my old shul in the Heights that USED to have davka hamotzi for kiddush on Shabbos and Yom Tov in the "good old days". <br clear="all">
<br>-- <br>Kol Tuv / Best Regards,<br>RabbiRichWolpoe@Gmail.com<br>see: <a href="http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/">http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/</a>