<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7651.59">
<TITLE>Haarama</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/rtf format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Just listened to an interesting shiur by R' Bleich. He mentions 3 categories of haarama. The first is those where chazal felt negatively - where there was a "purpose" being lost (e.g. bringing tvuah in through roof so as to avoid matnot - since the purpose was to have a leisure class who could teach). The second was those that chazal were indifferent to (e.g. sale of chametz since there was no "mitzvah" to have chametz to get rid of [iirc he did mention possible to have just a little for biur]) and third those that chazal approved of (e.g. involving non-Jew in ownership of cow so as not to have bchor issue where would have to let it wander until had mum)</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">This led to discussion of heter iska and changing nature of borrowing (providential loan to capital formation)</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Question. Where would pruzbol fit into this classification scheme? Are there any other classification schemes? There are other obvious interesting implications this year but I'd rather stick to the classification issue for now.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">KT<BR>
Joel Rich</FONT>
</P>
<br><br><table bgcolor=white style="color:black"><tr><td><br>THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE <br>
ADDRESSEE. IT MAY CONTAIN PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL <br>
INFORMATION THAT IS EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE. Dissemination, <br>
distribution or copying of this message by anyone other than the addressee is <br>
strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify us <br>
immediately by replying: "Received in error" and delete the message. <br>
Thank you.<br>
</td></tr></table></BODY>
</HTML>