.<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Chazal can't be wrong. If you believe that derashos are constructive --<br>
and amazingly include something halakhah lemaaseh even in the midbar! --<br>
then it means their position DEFINES halakhah.<br>
<br>
Asserting they were wrong would mean asserting that HQBH gave them the<br>
tools to construct a law He would't have approved of. Does Hashem err?<br>
<br>
...<br>
Tir'u baTov!<br>
-Micha<br>
</blockquote></div><br>Assuming: <br><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote">Chazal can't be wrong. </blockquote><div><br>To be asolute then: How does masechta Horyos work? Are Hazal more infallible than a Sanhedrin?<br>
<br></div>It appears fro mteh Torah and hazal that<br><ol><li>Nasi</li><li>Sanhedrin</li><li>Kohein Gadol<br></li></ol>Are all quite fallaible, Even Aharon corrected Moshe Rabbeinu once. And Elazar Hakohein completed an error of Ommision by Moshe Rabbeinu. <br>
<br><br>- <br>Kol Tuv / Best Regards,<br>RabbiRichWolpoe@Gmail.com<br>see: <a href="http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/">http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/</a>