<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Yitzhak Grossman <<a href="mailto:celejar@gmail.com">celejar@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Sun, 4 May 2008 19:24:01 -0400<br>
Micha Berger <<a href="mailto:micha@aishdas.org">micha@aishdas.org</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 02:03:45AM -0400, Michael Makovi wrote:<br>
</div>...<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
> : 1a) Rather, then, Rambam is saying that no deliberate additions were<br>
> : made after Moshe...<br>
><br>
> Or even semantic accidental changes. Cheseiros and yeseiros, or variations<br>
> in the spelling of "petzua daka", may change the kashrus of a seifer,<br>
> but unless you have a beis din ready to derashin a din from that pasuq,<br>
> they won't make a stitch of difference.<br>
<br>
</div>Minhas Hinuch (#613) tries to argue your claim, that we assume accuracy<br>
even with regard to haseros ve'yeseros as long as they are semantically<br>
significant, but he runs into trouble with the word 'totafos', since<br>
according to Rashi, the Gemara's D'rashah of the four Parshiyos of<br>
Tefillin is based on the plene spelling of the word in Parshas Ve'haya<br>
Im, whereas we have it deficient.<br>
<br>
> Tir'u baTov!<br>
> -Micha<br>
<br>
Yitzhak<br>
<font color="#888888">--<br></font><div><div class="Wj3C7c"><a href="http://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/avodah-aishdas.org" target="_blank"></a></div></div></blockquote></div><br>I've been told that Rashi had 6-7 spelling differences in his version of Torah from our version of the Torah. One that comes to mind is in my Sidra - viz.Chanichav. <br>
<br>Rabbi Kanarfogel told me that such changes do come about but that they must go through the Halachic Process. <br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Kol Tuv / Best Regards,<br>RabbiRichWolpoe@Gmail.com<br>see: <a href="http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/">http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/</a>