<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Zev Sero <<a href="mailto:zev@sero.name">zev@sero.name</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">Richard Wolpoe wrote:<br>
<br>
> Ein hachi Name, that was in my earlier post - namely that jsut a small<br>
> amound of the hamotzi should be enough and that 2 k'zeisim is not<br>
> needed, just a kezyis of al achilas plus some more of hamotzi. But<br>
> pehraps the argument is that the "plus some more" itself requires a<br>
> minimum of another k'zayyis, but I am not quite convinced.<br>
<br>
</div>No, it's got nothing to do with that; the question is which matzah<br>
the "al achilat matzah" is on. Is it on the prusah over which the<br>
hagadah was said, or is it on the shlema. Since we don't know, we<br>
take a kezayit from each. Obviously for those who eat from neither one<br>
but from the box, there is no point in eating more than one kezayit.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Zev Sero <br></font></blockquote></div><br>AHA! I knew I was fuzzy but now I understand the point I overloked- yyasher ko'ach.<br><br>And do we not say huvrar lemafrei'a? <br>Or since Achilas Matza this would not work? <br clear="all">
<br>-- <br>Kol Tuv / Best Regards,<br>RabbiRichWolpoe@Gmail.com<br>see: <a href="http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/">http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/</a>