<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 6:09 PM, <a href="mailto:kennethgmiller@juno.com">kennethgmiller@juno.com</a> <<a href="mailto:kennethgmiller@juno.com">kennethgmiller@juno.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">R' Richard Wolpoe wrote:<br><br>
<br>
But I'm glad you mentioned Kiddush, because it is very relevant to this discussion, in the case where one wants to satisfy Kiddush Bemakom Seudah with no hamotzi and no mezonos, but rather with wine. See the Shmiras Shabbos K'Hilchasa 54:23, that in such a case he should drink a melo lugmav for Kiddush, PLUS a reviis for the Seudah, but that anyone he is being motzi can just drink the reviis as their seudah. (Full disclosure: He also says that b'shaas had'chak the lone reviis will work for both kiddush and the seudah. But I'm confident that b'shaas had'chak the lone kezayis will work for both matza and lechem mishneh too!)<br>
</blockquote></div><br>Full disclosure: I was being COY becuase I knew that some say revi'is PLUS and others say you can rely upon the single revi'is at least behsa'as hadechak SSK is not alone on this matter.<br>
<br>Point is w/o Zev Sero's point re: safeik wof which piece why do you need TWO?<br>I was hinting that TWO might really mean on some level ONE pluus. [kinda like Shiva is 6 plus] <br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Kol Tuv / Best Regards,<br>
RabbiRichWolpoe@Gmail.com<br>see: <a href="http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/">http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/</a>