<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Richard Wolpoe <<a href="mailto:rabbirichwolpoe@gmail.com">rabbirichwolpoe@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:45 AM, M Cohen <<a href="mailto:mcohen@touchlogic.com" target="_blank">mcohen@touchlogic.com</a>> wrote:<br></div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid">
<div class="Ih2E3d">I have had the same kasha.<br><br>My conclusion was that since the leniences of tachanun are very much<br>affected by minhag<br></div>mordechai cohen<br><br></blockquote></div><br>Tur quqotes Rav Natronai [sp??] Gaon: "Tachanun is optional"<br>
Thus anyone has ample Halachici precedent to be meikel.<br clear="all"></blockquote>
<div>I would hardly call a daas Yachid of the Geonim cited by the tur ample halachic precedent for leniency... For something to even be a bar samcha it has to be accepted l'halacha to at least some degree.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>KT,</div>
<div>Michael</div></div>