<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Micha Berger <<a href="mailto:micha@aishdas.org">micha@aishdas.org</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
(Using TIDE loosely, as RSRH was vehemently and vociferously against<br>
Hildesheimer Seminary's use of Chokhmas Yisrael (O Wissenschaft), and<br>
Hildesheimer's preached vehemently against Austritt.)<br>
<br>
SheTir'u baTov!<br>
-micha<br>
</blockquote></div><br>Talking about another Berliner<br>I asked R. Kanarfogel about RYDS position re: Wissenshaft and Torah<br>His response was it depends. If it made sense he embraced it, if it did not he rejected it.<br>
<br>Kind of like my post on Zli keidar! <smile><br><br>On a more general [and perhaps worrisome] topic<br>When did Halachah start evolving into "irrinational" anti-sechel norms?<br><br>I once heard in the hallow halls of RIETS that the Rav [RYDS} said if it makes no sense it cannot be halachah. and this is pPerhaps why RYDS did no buy into the Taz's humra of Davening late on Shauvos!]- and even the Magen Avraham ONLY required saying Kiddush after Tzeis [ayein sham!]<br>
-- <br>Kol Tuv / Best Regards,<br><a href="mailto:RabbiRichWolpoe@Gmail.com">RabbiRichWolpoe@Gmail.com</a><br>see: <a href="http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/">http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/</a>