[From nobody Thu May 13 12:50:44 2010
X-Mozilla-Keys: 
Message-ID: <47A3511C.6050703@att.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 12:04:28 -0500
From: David Riceman <driceman@att.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Riceman <driceman@att.net>
Subject: Re: critique of mussar
References: <66E14064-0A98-41EB-8595-ED143CC5FA57@cox.net>
	<331485a50801290922y5e50f59fxd78e29ff2c81d358@mail.gmail.com>
	<479F6F0B.4080505@att.net> <47A34FE6.8020400@att.net>
In-Reply-To: <47A34FE6.8020400@att.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Just adding a footnote:

Incidentally the person who made the remark about Ramhal was on the 
mark.  My friend mentioned (using different terms) that he found 
Ramhal's outlook too Cartesian to take seriously.

 (for a hilarious attempt to resolve this see Aryeh Kaplan, A Handbook 
of Jewish Thought, vol. 1, the first sentence in paragraph 3:33)
>
> David Riceman
>


]