<div class="gmail_quote">On Nov 13, 2007 6:25 PM, Liron Kopinsky <<a href="mailto:liron.kopinsky@gmail.com" target="_blank">liron.kopinsky@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d">Lurker piping in here for a second.<br><br></div>
<div class="Ih2E3d">2) It has always bothered me how Rashi could say that Ya'akov kept Taryag Mitzvot when we know explicitly that he didn't by marrying Rachel.
<br>Kol Tuv,<br><font color="#888888">~Liron Kopinsky<br>
</font><br></div></blockquote><div>While I was in Yeshivas Ner Israel it was explained to me that the Avos did not LITERALLY keep Taryag, but they DID keep the principles BEHIND the Taryag. <br></div></div><br>This is congruent with the notion that the mitzvos as WE know them are not THE intrinsic Torah and could be suspended in Yemos Hamashiach.
<br><br>But behind the revelaed "nigleh" Torah there IS an intrinsic "nistar" Torah that IS immutable<br></div>-- <br>Kol Tuv / Best Regards,<br><a href="mailto:RabbiRichWolpoe@Gmail.com">RabbiRichWolpoe@Gmail.com
</a><br>Please Visit: <br><a href="http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/">http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/</a>