<br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/22/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Arie Folger</b> <<a href="mailto:afolger@aishdas.org">afolger@aishdas.org</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br><br>Somehow, the more I look into this, the more that I become convinced of how<br>grave the lack of a rebbi talmid relationship is.<br><br>--<br>Arie Folger<br><a href="http://www.ariefolger.googlepages.com">http://www.ariefolger.googlepages.com
</a><br>_______________________________________________<br></blockquote></div><br><br>AISI once seforim started being printed texts replaced TSBP.<br>Example a young Yekke goes tot yeshiva and he notes that the Mishna Brura pasken lehisateif betzitzis with a sheva. But the minhag at KAJ/Breuer's is with a patach.
<br><br>So his position is: why doesn't Breuer's conform with the MB?<br><br>Several hundred years ago the converse probably would have happened. A talmid steeped in mimetics would have asked, how come this Sefer is knegged our firm Minhag. I guess this returns us to issues of Rupture and Reconstruction.
<br><br>The other tangent is, so if Yeshiva X can follow the GRA and yeshiva Y can follow the MB why can't simply one follow the Rema? or Kitzur? &c.<br><br>So why can't one take [e.g.] The Magen Avraham as his poseik and ask she'eilos ONLY in ares not covered? [FWIW SA harav defaults to Magen Avraham.
<br><br>And according to Wikipedia, the Taz was ratified by the va'ad of 4 lands..<br> -- <br>Kol Tuv / Best Regards,<br><a href="mailto:RabbiRichWolpoe@Gmail.com">RabbiRichWolpoe@Gmail.com</a><br>Please Visit: <br><a href="http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/">
http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/</a>