On 10/8/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Dov Kay</b> <<a href="mailto:dov_kay@hotmail.co.uk">dov_kay@hotmail.co.uk</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>
<< >1) Isn't saying Shir HaMaalos MiMamakim a hefsek between Yishtabach and<br>Borchu?<br> <br>
<br>
The Aroch Hashulchan defends the custom of saying it after yishtabach on the basis that it is l'tzorech hatefillah and no worse than other mitzva-related interruptions which the Rema permits at that point. Jeckes, of course, do not say it...
<br><span class="ad"><br></span></div></blockquote></div>As I posted before, Rema permits a public request for a hearing in fornt of Beis din at this point. So that is aiui the pesach for this concept<br><br>I still like the Jecke position of not saying it. OTOH it does make a dramatic point.
<br><br>-- <br>Kol Tuv / Best Regards,<br><a href="mailto:RabbiRichWolpoe@Gmail.com">RabbiRichWolpoe@Gmail.com</a><br>Please Visit: <br><a href="http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/">http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/</a>