<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/25/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Minden</b> <<a href="mailto:phminden@arcor.de">phminden@arcor.de</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
R' Arie Folger replied to RDBloom:<br>>> I may add that Baer and Heidenheim also don't print Thilim 27 LeDavid, H Ori VeYishi, which Litvaks say from RH Elul thru Sukkot.<br>><br>> They do.<br><br>Is this Heidenheim or post-Heidenheim edited Rödelheim? This Eastern ref-, er, innovation was only just being copied at that time, and even now still hasn't been accepted by "old Yekkes", as you can see with several from among your own sheep, who will talk, shake their heads or simply leave shul after the post-oleine kaddish (which isn't really MA itself, BTW, but don't tell). In fifty years' time, the latter behaviour will be entered in the sifre minhogem, too, I take it.
<br><br>LPhM<br><a href="http://lipmans.blogspot.com">http://lipmans.blogspot.com</a><br></blockquote></div><br>AFAIK Breuer's NEVER said Psalm 27 Ledovid<br>At my old Shul - Cong. Ohav Sholaum - "we split the baby in 2 and said iun the morning after the yom but NOT in the evening.
<br><br>Also Breuer's did not say Psalm 105 on Rosh Chodesh, COS did. <br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Gmar Tov<br>Best Wishes for 5768,<br><a href="mailto:RabbiRichWolpoe@Gmail.com">RabbiRichWolpoe@Gmail.com</a><br>Please Visit:
<br><a href="http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/">http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/</a>