<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/3/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Micha Berger</b> <<a href="mailto:micha@aishdas.org">micha@aishdas.org</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br><br>I don't understand RZS's (or should I say RYBS's and R' Hutner's)<br>problem.<br><br>Isn't /every/ tefillah granted because of the zekhus of the tefillah<br>itself? It's not like we can wheedle or beg Hashem to give anything but
<br>"gam zu letovah".<br><br>Rather, as RYBS and RSRH write, tefillah changes the mispallel into<br>someone who warrants different treatment. Thus the hitpa'el conjugation<br>of "lehispalel".<br><br>
Tir'u baTov!<br>-mi<br><br>--<br></blockquote></div>I concur AND would like to add:<br><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote">That the fact that a TZIBBUR is mispallel adds a level of Zechus and expectation. Isn't there some source iirc that says something like "a Tzibbur is never completely denied a bakasha"?
<br><br>OTOH the silent portions of Yizkor that are said privately might NEED a nedava to get enough zechus...<br></blockquote><br> <br>-- <br>Kesiva vaChasima Tova<br>Best Wishes for 5768,<br><a href="mailto:RabbiRichWolpoe@Gmail.com">
RabbiRichWolpoe@Gmail.com</a><br>Please Visit: <br><a href="http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/">http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/</a>