On 7/31/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Marty Bluke</b> <<a href="mailto:marty.bluke@gmail.com">marty.bluke@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<It seems that Rashi holds that it is a miracle, just like the other things.<br><br>Interestingly enough R' Yaakov quotes that Rashi and brings it as a<br>proof that the 2 sets of luchos were exactly the same, meaning that
<br>the 2 luchos were identical. He maintains however, that only 1 set of<br>text was written on the luchos.</blockquote><div><br><br>I was just listening to a parsha shiur at <a href="http://www.rabbisitorsky.com">http://www.rabbisitorsky.com
</a> , a Rabbi in Bayswater, NY. He says that the midrashim state that the first luchot were written as recorded in Yitro & the second as recorded in V'Etchanan. There are 17 more words & letter the "tet" is in V'Etchanan & not in Yitro.
<br></div><br></div><br>