<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 7/29/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Marty Bluke</b> <<a href="mailto:marty.bluke@gmail.com">marty.bluke@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">We know that they were both said at the same time, but what was<br>actually written on the luchos themselves. It is clear from the gemara
<br>that only 1 of them was written as the gemara comments that the mem<br>and the samech were b'nes, if both zachor and shamor were somehow<br>written b'nes the gemara certainly would have mentioned it.<br><br>R' Yaakov Kamenetsky addresses this question (in Parshas Vaetchanan)
<br>and claims that zachor was written but the kri was shamor. He says<br>this would apply to all the other differences as well (kri uksiv).<br><br>However, this is very difficult as the end of the dibra of Shabbos is<br>
completely different, in Yisro it talks about the 7 days of creation<br>and in Vaeschanan it talks about yetzias mitzrayim. On one word I can<br>see saying kri uksiv but not on a whole pasuk.<br><br>Has anyone seen any other mefarshim address this issue?
</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>Rashi Sanhedrin 56b d"h Ka'asher tziv'cha (quoted by Sifsei Chachamim in Va'eschanan): "V'chol mah shekasuv badibros ha'acharonos haya kasuv baluchos v'chein shama b'sinai."
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>It seems that Rashi holds that it is a miracle, just like the other things.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>KT,<br>Michael</div><br> </div>