<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body dir="ltr" bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-top: 0pt;">How do <u><b>you</b></u>
understand that "TT [is] a redemptive, cathartic, and inspiring..." for
the kid who is being compelled to learn the Tosafos he finds utterly
uninteresting, tedious and boring?</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-top: 0pt;"><br>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-top: 0pt;">YGB<br>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-top: 0pt;"><br>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-top: 0pt;"><br>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-top: 0pt;">Jacob Sasson wrote:<br>
</p>
<blockquote
cite="mid6bff89a80703151204r6030fbffy11d7a0c34d23796@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">But see <a
href="http://mail-jewish.org/rav/talmud_torah.txt">http://mail-jewish.org/rav/talmud_torah.txt</a>
where RYBS states (in the last paragraph):
<div>"halacha ... is a living, dynamic discipline which was given to
man in order to redeem him and to save him." </div>
<div> </div>
<div>With respect to Talmud Torah (the subject of the RYGB v.
Colleague dispute), he writes that "talmud torah [is] a redemptive,
cathartic, and inspiring reality." Surely, RYGB's colleague would
argue that, a la RYBS, all talmidim deserve an equal oportunity for
"redemption."
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>