The Jerusalem Post just posted this story: <span class="articleHead">Mother insists on proving her son is a 'mamzer' (</span><a href="http://tinyurl.com/y49end">http://tinyurl.com/y49end</a>). After separating from her husband but before receiving a get, a woman had a child with another man. Misrad haPnim automatically put the name of her former husband (to whom she was married at the time) as the father. She is suing to get the name of the father changed to the name of the man she claims is the real father.
<br><br>From the article:<br><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><span class="lead"><p>"From a Jewish standpoint, Moshe's mother should
leave his kosher status the way it is, said Rabbi Moshe Rauchverger, a
senior member of the Chief Rabbinate's Governing Council and a marriage
registrar in the Haifa area.
</p><p>"What does the mother gain from her stubbornness?" he asked. "Does she want her son to be a <i>mamzer</i>?" <br></p><p>[snip]</p><p><span class="lead">In Moshe's case, Halacha assumes that Moshe is not a
<i>mamzer</i>
unless contrary evidence proves otherwise. A woman's legal husband is
assumed to be the father of all of her children until she is divorced.
Even when there is suspicion of infidelity, according to Halacha: "The
majority of sexual acts take place with the legal husband."</span></p><p><span class="lead"><p>Moshe's mother did not receive her <i>get</i>
from her first husband until she was eight months pregnant, although
they had separated long before. When Moshe was born she had not yet
married Moshe's biological father. The Interior Ministry clerk who
registered Moshe's birth automatically assumed, in accordance with
Halacha, that Moshe's mother's first husband was the father.
</p><p>Now Moshe's mother plans to go to court to prove the truth. <span class="lead"><br></span></p></span></p></span></div><span class="lead"><p><span class="lead"><p><span class="lead"><p>Is this for real? The mother is claiming that she had no actual contact with the man who was her halachic husband at the time of conception. There might be a chazaka that "the majority of sexual acts take place with the legal husband", but in this case, we have the direct testimony of the woman that this is not so. Does the name printed on the birth certificate actually have significance in this case in determining whether or not the child is a mamzer?
<br></p></span><span class="lead"><p>Yaakov Ellis</p></span></p></span></p></span><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><span class="lead"><p><span class="lead"><p><span class="lead"></span></p></span></p></span></div>