[Avodah] Consistency in8 Workarounds?

Rich, Joel JRich at sibson.com
Mon Jun 4 11:24:18 PDT 2018


On 31/05/18 09:25, Rich, Joel via Avodah wrote:
>> In the discussion of the beer brouhaha (distributor is Jewish and owns 
>> beer over pesach), one source quoted is S'A C"M 99:7, which deals with a 
>> case where Reuvain signs over his assets to a third party, borrows 
>> money, but continues his business as if nothing happened. The Beit Din 
>> is to look through the sign over if the lender comes to collect and 
>> Reuvain claims insolvency.
>> Do you think it's a slam dunk that one could parallel this to selling an 
>> ongoing business for Pesach?

[Zev Sero:]
> Not at all, for two separate reasons.

> First, there is no parallel at all between giving away all of ones 
> property, in which case why would one still be using it, and selling a 
> going concern, where obviously one does and is expected to stay and 
> continue working for the business, and the business does and is expected 
> to continue as usual, with no difference perceptible to the customers. 

AIUI there was no change in the business other than the 'titular" ownership

> Second, that entire siman is about bet din not allowing people to get 
> away with fraud, by rolling back transactions that were transparently 
> made in order to defraud someone.  In this se'if, the entire purpose of 
> the "gift" was to defraud subsequent lenders, who were not to know that 
> the "donor" no longer had any assets, and lent on the assumption that he 
> still owned what he was publicly known to own.  So in the name of equity 
> the BD treats the transaction as never having happened.    See the 
> Mechaber's opinion at the end of se'if 2, where it's very clear that 
> he's concerned about what's fair, not what's technically correct.   So 
> none of this has any relevance to Hilchos Pesach, where "equity" is not 
> an issue; Hashem is not being "cheated".  He commanded us not to own 
> chametz, and He gave us a choshen mishpat to determine who owns what, 
> and He certainly knows about all our transactions, so if we follow that 
> CM and dispose of our chametz there's no "fraud" and no need for a BD to 
> "pierce" it in the name of equity.

https://headlinesbook.podbean.com/mf/download/reyy6b/headlines_6-2-18.mp3
6/2/18 Owning Businesses in Halacha and Hashkafa: People who are making
a difference- Freddy Friedman, Elchonon Schwartz, Rabbi Yosef Kushner,
Nesanel Davis, Shimon Webster, Mr. Sol Werdiger


The first half deals with a similar type of arrangement for nursing
homes-so aiui you're saying it's up to the Rabbis to evaluate the "need"
in each case to determine if haaramah is allowable?

KT
Joel Rich



More information about the Avodah mailing list