[Avodah] Would Ruth's conversion be rejected today?

Zev Sero zev at sero.name
Sun Jun 3 15:34:06 PDT 2012


On 3/06/2012 2:00 AM, Elazar M. Teitz wrote:
>  However, the Beis Yosef in EH, end of siman 11, quotes the Nimukei Yosef  that the din of lo yichnos applies not only to rumors, but even if is a known fact that they cohabited; his source is an explicit Tosefta (Perek 4, Halacha 5), which reads "haba al hanochris," rather than "hanitan."  The Beis Shmuel cites it as well, in s.k. 17.  No differing opinion is cited.

1. See Chochmas Shlomo al asar.  He gives a lot of references to other
places in which he explained it at length, but I have not followed
them up.  But I was mechaven to what he says here.

2. Re the BY quoting the Nimukei Yosef, I haven't yet looked it up, but
a general note: I have reason to believe, based on a completely unrelated
instance, that the BY did not have access to the NY, and his quotes are
either second-hand or remembered from a time when he did have access.
Was it in print in his day?


-- 
Zev Sero        "Natural resources are not finite in any meaningful
zev at sero.name    economic sense, mind-boggling though this assertion
                  may be. The stocks of them are not fixed but rather
		 are expanding through human ingenuity."
		                            - Julian Simon



More information about the Avodah mailing list