[Avodah] Local, Non-Global or Global Flood
Arie Folger
afolger at aishdas.org
Tue Nov 30 13:23:49 PST 2010
You asked
> What bar did I set higher than what the sources demand?
Well, in writing:
> Rav Saadia Gaon, the Rambam and the Ikkarim explicitly, and others
> implicitly, maintain the meaning of the word must be its primary meaning,
> unless it transgresses one of the rules you mentioned
you have, I believe, conflated secondary meanings of words with
allegory. Also, the second condition, "Where it[the literal reading --
arie] is repudiated by obvious logic" is a possibly large category.
Depends on which Rishon or Acharon you ask. Ralbag and Malbim would
both include physics in this.
In general, I take issue with the formulation "... maintain the
meaning of the word *must* be its primary meaning, unless ..." That is
the phrase I had in mind when I wrote that language is not math,
especially the verb "must." I consider that rule what I call a
dominant preference, not an absolute rule, because language just
doesn't behave like that.
KT,
--
Arie Folger,
Recent blog posts on http://ariefolger.wordpress.com/
* Basler Gymnasium experimentiert mit Chawrutá-Lernen
* Where Will We Find Refuge ... from technology overload
* Video-Vortrag: Psalm 34
* We May Have Free Will, After All
* Equal Justice for All
* Brutal Women of Nazi Germany
* Gibt es in der Unterhaltungsliteratur eine Rolle für G"tt?
More information about the Avodah
mailing list