[Avodah] Kol Isha - HETER
T613K at aol.com
T613K at aol.com
Fri Feb 12 00:07:24 PST 2010
From: Michael Makovi <mikewinddale at gmail.com>
> Where's the qol ishah in your example [of Egypt and Umm Kalthoum]?
> Because they knew where the songs
> were from when they heard a male chazan sing them?
>
> R' Micha Berger
>> No. What I meant was, the rabbi knew EXACTLY where these tunes came
from, and far from criticizing listening to Umm Kalthoum, he instead
allowed her tunes into the synagogue!! What this means is, the rabbi
implicitly granted his heter to listen to her. If the rabbi thought it
was prohibited to listen to her, then he wouldn't let her tunes be
used in the shul. <<
Michael Makovi
>>>>>
Umm Kalthoum was a very popular female Egyptian singer. People listened
to her on the radio. Very few ever saw her in concert. Her radio
broadcasts were probably pre-recorded or they may have been live, but in any case
there are certainly poskim who permit a woman's voice if recorded and/or if
broadcast over the radio, where one cannot see the singer. Some even
permit watching a singer on TV or in a movie, and then there are even some who
permit a live show, if the woman's voice cannot be heard naturally but must
be "articially" reproduced and amplified via a microphone in order to be
heard. Even in this order of increasing leniency, you do not find any who
simply permit kol isha, with no further qualifications.
The leap from the fact that this singer's tunes were sung in shul to the
assumption that the rabbanim of Egypt OBVIOUSLY permitted kol ishah is just
such an extravagant leap that it boggles the mind.
In other posts RMM has repeatedly asserted that R' Weinberg unequivocally
permitted kol ishah. I do not believe this is true. Did he permit women
to sing solo in front of men? I think he permitted women to sing in mixed
groups, such as oneg Shabbos youth groups -- not as a performance, not in
a choir, not for the pleasure of an "audience" but in a natural setting
where blended voices did not readily permit one voice to be picked out from
the others. I don't think this is such a radical innovation as some seem to
think and I don't think there is any basis for RMM's repeated assertion
that R' Weinberg held that there is no issur of kol ishah anymore, period.
--Toby Katz
==========
--------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/avodah-aishdas.org/attachments/20100212/71394dc7/attachment-0002.htm>
More information about the Avodah
mailing list