[Avodah] Habituation

[Micha Berger]

On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 12:24:56PM +0200, Michael Makovi wrote:
: Rn' Chana explained how the AhS could hold there is an absolute issur
: of exposing hair for a married woman, but not for an unmarried one. In
: short: the sugyot regarding Sotah and divorcing one's wife speaking
: only of married women, and furthermore say nothing about hirhur. By
: contrast, he sugya in Berakhot speaks of hair in general (married or
: not), and speaks of hirhur. It is thus possible, but not obligatory,
: to say (as I do) that hair-covering applies to ALL women (married or
: not), and is mitigated by hergel.

Despite the gemara's derashah/asmachta of a pasuq. Sorry, I don't see it.

Tir'u baTov!
-Micha