[Avodah] Timtum HaLev
Zvi Lampel
zvilampel at gmail.com
Tue Mar 16 14:59:27 PDT 2010
Timtum HaLev
A factor to consider in this discussion:
The Drashos HaRan (#5, I think) writes (regarding the imperative to
follow the Sages):
''We believe that everything the Torah warns us against is indeed
harmful to us, and creates a negative imprint on our souls, even though
we may not know the mechanics behind that process. Therefore, if the
consensus of the Sages is that something [actually tamei] is tahor--so
what? Won't it harm us and produce its natural effect, whatever it
is?...How could the nature of that thing change itself just because if
the Sages' consensus that it is permissable? This is imposssible short
of a miracle.
(He answers that the spiritual gains in obeying the mitzva of following
the Sages counteracts the harmful consequences of the rare instances
where the Sages may be wrong.) The point relevant to this discussion is
the Ran's presumption that anything forbidden (things or actions)
carries direct spiritual damage regardless of intent. Also relevant, of
course, is the role of innocent intent (if one may generalize from
intent of following the Sages--maybe not?) of counteracting the damage.
Zvi Lampel
More information about the Avodah
mailing list