[Avodah] any makor

[rabbirichwolpoe at gmail.com]

rabbirichwolpoe at gmail.com wrote:
: But doesn't the m'chabeir state that zachor and para are d'orraisso

Micha:
> I see them as matbei'os derabbanan for fulfilling a deOraisa.
> Which is why I cited Chaim's discussion of the Peri Megadim, who holds
> that when they make such a matbei'ah, one doesn't even fulfill the
> deOraisa if you do something else for it instead.
> RSM obvious didn't reach the Peri Megadim's conclusion.

I'm not posting to dispute this rather
I merely wish to ADD that I sense that RSM has an additional subtle
agenda, and one that I was hinting at it, too

Namely, there were at times - such as this - a halachic drift from
Rishonim to Acharonim

And I suspect RSM was illustrating that drift by showing a piece of Shas
- that had been rejected by Rishonim as being normative - morphed into
becoming normative by acharonim.

FP
RRW
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile