[Avodah] Halacha vs. Policy - Poll re: Who To Marry
T613K at aol.com
T613K at aol.com
Sun Feb 7 22:11:33 PST 2010
From: rabbirichwolpoe at gmail.com
To: "Daniel Eidensohn" <yadmoshe at 012.net.il>,
> The truth is not this way. Rambam (Hilchos Issurei Bi'ah 12:7-8)
> states that even though sexual relations with a non-Jewish maidservant
> is only a rabbinic prohibition he rules that, "this sin even though
> it is not punished by capital punishment from the court should not be
> viewed lightly. That is because there is a loss associated with sexual
> relations with a nonJew which you don't find in the violation of all
> the other prohibited sexual relations. [--RDE citing Rambam]
>> My question -- which is essentially academic -- is this a meta-Halachic
consideration or straight basic Halachah? <<
KT
RRW
>>>>>
I do not believe this can possibly be a halachic teshuvah -- IOW it MUST be
meta-halachic -- because no true halachic shailah can ever be couched in
these terms: "Rabbi, I have absolutely made up my mind to sin and I want
you to tell me which sin to commit, sin A or sin B." No halachic teshuvah
could ever be rendered to any such phoney shailah. No posek could ever
pasken that a Jew should commit a sin. (He could give advice, but not a psak.)
(A completely different case would be one where a person says, "If I have
to take a sick child to the hospital on Shabbos, should I do this or should
I do that?" Because there, there is no actual chillul Shabbos since the
halacha itself says that pikuach nefesh comes first, and so even if it is
preferable, say, to take a taxi rather than drive your own car, the actual
shailah is not "What sin should I commit?")
--Toby Katz
==========
--------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/avodah-aishdas.org/attachments/20100208/38ca8efe/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Avodah
mailing list