[Avodah] Child Abuse and Moser

[Micha Berger]

On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 06:07:26PM -0500, Cantor Wolberg wrote:
: That means the police -- not a beis din. Dina d'Malchuta Dina.

DDD isn't necessarily applicable. If aa BD /could/ handle the case, there
is chiyuv to go to BD. And therefore DDD would be trumped. And since BD
can't, one has to protect people from further harm, so DDD is redundant.

Besides, the extent to which DDD applies beyond CM is iffy. Here it's
hezeq, so one could argue that aspect would. But thaat wouldn't impinge
on how that law is enforced.

Tir'u baTov!
-Micha

-- 
Micha Berger                 Time flies...
micha at aishdas.org                    ... but you're the pilot.
http://www.aishdas.org                       - R' Zelig Pliskin
Fax: (270) 514-1507