[Avodah] Ta'aroves of yayn mevushal

[rabbirichwolpoe at gmail.com]

> In answer to Rabbi Wolpe's question it is important to recognise that
> no issur has been made. However, there is a question of whether bittul
> occurs in Heter b'heter (as noted by Shach 22 on YD 99). In that case
> the milk 'fell' into the water (Lashon Bedieved, but Lechatchila this
> is assur as noted by the Beit Meir) and that later on, the problem
> is only a question of ta'am. However, in his first comment on YD 299,
> the Shach makes it clear that where concerns exist other than ta'am,
> then bittul of heter b'heter does not work. As such I presume that you
> may not mix in mevushal wine. However, I would be keen to learn if this
> is not the case. Johnny Solomon

WADR this completely misses the point! It's not even close. There is
zero issur being introduced here!!!

My case is more like this:

At what point does a combination of wine with x lose its borei pri
hagaffen status. And I can find the answer to that!

So now at what point can I add enough mevushal wine so that the original
wine it loses its non mevushal status w/o heating it!

If u want to say min bemino is not bateil then even a drop of nonmev
ushal wine that fallks into mevushal would change its status.

I think it's safe to assume davar sheyeish lo matirin does not apply
cause heating wine messes it up.!
 
KT 
RRW 
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile