[Avodah] police misdeeds and trial evidence

[Zev Sero]

Yitzhak Grossman wrote:

> I accept that testimony which contradicts our unassailable scientific
> conclusions must be rejected, but how can you infer from that
> that we can impeach legitimate witnesses based on the testimony of
> women?

What about assailable scientific conclusions?  What if a forensic
scientist testifies that there is a 60% chance that the witnesses
are lying and the defendant is innocent?  What if the chance is only
30%?

-- 
Zev Sero               Something has gone seriously awry with this Court's
zev at sero.name          interpretation of the Constitution.
                       	                          - Clarence Thomas