[Avodah] More Philosophy, If Anyone's Up to It

Ira Tick itick1986 at gmail.com
Mon Sep 8 15:45:32 PDT 2008


On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Micha Berger <micha at aishdas.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 03:18:25AM -0500, Ira Tick wrote:
> :              What I meant by unity of the soul was whether
> scientifically,
> : so to speak, the speculative and investigative person would describe his
> : immaterial self as "one" entity, despite the distinct dimensions of
> : experience.
>
> I think that one's immaterial self is a single process of interlocking
> parts, none of which would be the same without their interaction to the
> other parts.
>
> The first chapter of the Vilna Gaon's Even Sheleimah has a title that
> can be translated as "the whole purpose of the Torah is to shatter the
> middos". Implied in this, and for that matter in RYSalanter's entire
> project is the idea that soul and personality are identical.
>
> :                                                         How about when we
> : say that G-d is one?
>
> Hashem, OTOH, is One is a way we can't really understand.
>
> : someone were to focus only on a subjective spiritual view of religion,
> then
> : actual phenomenological or mathematical unity is irrelevant, which is how
> : unity of the soul ties in to my original post of whether holiness is an
> : objective mode of existence or merely an emotional state.
>
> Who said there is a difference between "objective mode of existence"
> and emotional state? If the mind is the soul, or at least something
> the soul does, then those emotional states are at least part of that
> objective mode.
>
> Tir'u baTov!
> -Micha



I like what you said about unity being able to refer to the "interlocking"
parts of the soul, that rotate and reconfigure but remain interconnected.
It's a nice mashal and one I haven't thought of in that exact way before,
nor thought about at all for a long time.
 Even so, if you or anyone else could elaborate...

As to G-d's Oneness, I would have thought that the unity of the soul would
be the only real available precedent, if G-d has the attributes ascribed to
Him.  In spite of all the restatements of His Oneness and how it is totally
different than our own and completely beyond human understanding, in the
end, we believe in G-d and paint Him as an actor in our lives with abilities
and actions and faculties analogous in some way to our own.  As I said,
despite their frustrations and caveats, the Rishonim seem to say this
clearly, especially R Saadia Gaon in Emunos V'Deos.  I'm capable of
believing in things I don't fully understand (at least sometimes I am), but
its hard not to want to understand just enough to get an idea that's
reasonable to believe, even if through [genuinely good] analogies.

I like very much your last point about the emotions themselves being enough
reality [for a person to be motivated by (?) ].  I meant specifically some
sort of objective reality that's mirrored by our association of emotion with
a person or with G-d, like love, which we use to describe the value and
importance someone has for us and how we view them through the lens of our
affectionate feelings.  However, as I said, I like what you wrote because
its important for everyone, myself especially, to accept our deepest
emotions and our conscience without too much analysis and self-doubt.

When it comes to those guiding and ultimately life-fulfilling feelings, the
question "Why?" may have little constructive meaning.  We should focus on
training ourselves to listen to our conscience and question our actions
instead.  Then, our inner voice will provide us the knowledge and guidance
we need to live life as "right" as can be by whatever definition of right is
possible.  If that means building an emotional relationship with G-d, and
more personal than metaphyiscal definitions of Holy, than so be it --
probably much healthier anyway and the way most people are capable of
living.

If the message of Torah is one of love and loyalty, and that those feelings
are self-affirming truths, then we can understand why, when discussing
Avodah MeiAhavah, the Rambam uses the word "Emes" in his famous line:  "Oseh
haemes mp'nei shehu emes, v'sof hatovah lavo b'chlal."  Love and loyalty to
G-d and to others is as lishmah as it gets.

We should all be zocheh this time of year to learn to respect ourselves, to
love G-d and each other in whatever way G-d makes us able, and see only
blessings as a result.

-- 
Ira Tick
6519 N Whipple
Chicago, IL 60645
(414) 699-8285

itick1986 at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/avodah-aishdas.org/attachments/20080908/56442173/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Avodah mailing list