[Avodah] D'rabanan vs. D'oraita

[Richard Wolpoe]

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Michael Makovi <mikewinddale at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> The Rambam tells us that for a SHOGEG violation of a d'rabanan, we don't
> need
> to do teshuva. My rabbi answered that since a d'rabanan is not an
> intrinsic sin, but rather the sin is only in ignoring or defying the
> words of the rabbis and rebelling against them, there is absolutely no
> sin whatsoever in violating a d'rabanan b'shogeg.
>
>
>
> Mikha'el Makovi


On a complete Tangent,in teaching Shulchan Aruch, etc. I noticed this
pattern re: penalties:


   1. D'oraissos - Both Meizid and Shoggeig  are always hayav
   2. Derabbanan's
      1. Meizidim USUALLY have a penalty
      2. Shoggeg Never [afaik so far] have a penalty post facto

I am guessing that this is consistent with this Rambam
If anyone can confirm this pattern as a stated rule somewhere [Yad Malachi?]
then I would appreciate it.

-- 
Kol Tuv / Best Regards,
RabbiRichWolpoe at Gmail.com
see: http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/avodah-aishdas.org/attachments/20080603/1cd795db/attachment-0002.htm>