[Avodah] Your brother's a Mumar; here's the solution!

[Moshe Y. Gluck]

> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:32:01AM -0400, Moshe Y. Gluck wrote:
> : The AhS makes it clear (157:17) that even if the T'nai is Chal and the
> : Kiddushin is not the Bi'os are still _not_ Be'los z'nus: "Kivan she'hee
> : m'yuchedes eilav l'vado v'einah k'zonah."
R' MB:
> Pilegesh bizman hazeh?

He's quoting a RaDaCH (with a Chaf). (I don't know who that is.) But in any
case, is he saying that she will be a Pilegesh, or that she isn't a Zonah?
And even if she is a Pilegesh, what's the problem? It isn't a L'chatchilah
Heter.

(BTW, this Halachah will be at http://tinyurl.com/669o7o when the project
gets to there.)

> BTW, the Rambam holds that a pilegesh is only mutar to a melekh. (Other
> pilaghos don't get a din zoneh, but despite the difference in chalos,
> the relations are still assur.)

But if I'm not mistaken he was widely argued upon, no?

KT,
MYG