[Avodah] Was Lavan daft, dense or what?

[Rich, Joel]

		<http://www.ariefolger.googlepages.com> 


	That is perhaps why a beis din requires multiple points of view
	Ein dan yehidi ela echad.
	And perhaps this explains why I favor relying upon a consensus
of poskim and while I remain skeptical of individual poskim.  Emunas
Chachamim not Emunas Chacham? 
	
	-- 
	Kol Tuv / Best Regards,
	RabbiRichWolpoe at Gmail.com
	 =================================================
	FWIW there is a difference between a beis din and use of
consensus of poskim.  The maalah of beit din (as discussed in the
commentaries on horiyot for example) is more along the lines either  of
the delphi technique - the back and forth of joint analysis (or
milchamta shel torah) will arrive at the correct conclusion- or that
there is a hashraat shechina (in particular the gemara there mentions 10
- iirc the ben yehoyada states the special shruya when a minyan is
formed).  While one could stretch these to consensus of poskim who don't
meet, it's at least somewhat a stretch.
	 
	KT
	Joel Rich

THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE 
ADDRESSEE.  IT MAY CONTAIN PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL 
INFORMATION THAT IS EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE.  Dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this message by anyone other than the addressee is 
strictly prohibited.  If you received this message in error, please notify us 
immediately by replying: "Received in error" and delete the message.  
Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/avodah-aishdas.org/attachments/20071204/be4889f3/attachment-0002.htm>