[Avodah] Yekum Purkan

Richard Wolpoe rabbirichwolpoe at gmail.com
Mon Dec 3 17:04:28 PST 2007


On Nov 29, 2007 1:48 PM, Zev Sero <zev at sero.name> wrote:

>
> PS: What I've long wondered, considering that minhagei Ashkenaz are
> supposed to come from EY and Sefard from Bavel, is why the Ashkenazi
> version of the bracha for the tzibbur is in Aramaic while the Sefardi
> one is in Hebrew.
> --
> Zev Sero


Gut gezugt!  but Also remember that the Yerushalmi is also in Aramaic!
There is Babylonian dialect of Aramaic and a Judean dilact Aramaic

The Yekum Purkan is clearly Babylonian. [no time to research details now]
AFAIK It is an exception to the above Klal. [klal is a generality more than
a rule] & FWIW In some Sephardic circles it is omitted due to the content of
the bakashos involved. and I concur. The fact that the references tothe
Reish Galutha are obsolete does not bother me so much. The bakashos
themselves [e.g. uvaryus gufa] seems to me as not shabbasdik
-- 
Kol Tuv / Best Regards,
RabbiRichWolpoe at Gmail.com
see: http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/avodah-aishdas.org/attachments/20071203/b8d16f5c/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Avodah mailing list