[Avodah] "Es Yom HaShmini Ho'Atzeres Hazeh"

[Richard Wolpoe]

On 10/14/07, Micha Berger <micha at aishdas.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:18:53AM +0000, Elazar M. Teitz wrote:
> : (1) The Torah nowhere refers to Shavuos as "atzeres." It is the Talmud
> : which does, and which uses the unmodified term to refer exclusively
> : to Shavuos.
>
> Doesn't the relevence of that observation depend on whether tefillos
> are written in leshon Tanakh or leshon Chazal?
>
> Tir'u baTov!
> -Micha
> _______________________________________________
>

lav Davka because my comments and the Rema's wer resricted to a given
passage and not based upon global rules. Rema is saying - aisi -that THIS
paragraph is using lashon Tanach, he is not making a sweeping
generalization. [davar halomeid mei'inyono]

so you cannot bring a  Rabbinical Term where  Rema is saying it must conform
to a Biblical Term.  Othre pasages might not have that  restriction

IF YOUR WERE RIGHT: then
hag matzos would be   Pesach,
Shavuos      would be  Atzeres
Sukkos        would be  Hag

 The use of Hag Hamatzos is a tip off to lashon Tanach.

Rema AISI is dirsregarding broad concepts that other modern Rabbis like to
impose and is being sensitive to the text QUA THE TEXT.







-- 
Kol Tuv / Best Regards,
RabbiRichWolpoe at Gmail.com
Please Visit:
http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/avodah-aishdas.org/attachments/20071015/077a9c65/attachment-0001.htm>