[Avodah] heter mechira produce - d'rabanan

[Goldmeier]

so does that mean that when we take into account and mention how it is 
d'rabanan as a reason "l'hakel", we are dmisplaced and in error?

---------
Goldmeier
goldmeier at 012.net.il

http://torahthoughts.blogspot.com
http://lifeinisrael.blogspot.com
http://parshaquestions.blogspot.com
http://yomtovthoughts.blogspot.com




Richard Wolpoe wrote:
> I would posit the hypothesis that an essential d'orraiso that has been 
> reduced to Derabbana status is stronger than a simple  "pure" Derabbanan.
>
> Other "strong" derabbanans include:
>
>    1. YT sheini shel galiyus
>    2. According to some the gzeiros on Bishul - shehiya, hazarr, and
>       Hatmanas -s s'feikam lechumra for that reason.   The g'zeriso
>       are  construed as  d'orraisso derivitaves. [See S. Edier's  book
>       on Hilchos Shabbas]
>
> I am not sure if the poskim are consious of this conecton, or just 
> aware that the trend with shmitta has been to be machmir so they are 
> perpetuating a pre-existing approach.  THAT approach might have been 
> due to these reasons.
>
> Since I know extremly little re: Shemitta itself, I am only guessing.  
> OTOH, regarding the aforementioned inyanim there is a lot of material  
> demonstrating this  phenomenon.
>  
>
> -- 
> Gmar Tov
> Best Wishes for 5768,
> RabbiRichWolpoe at Gmail.com <mailto:RabbiRichWolpoe at Gmail.com>
> Please Visit:
> http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Avodah mailing list
> Avodah at lists.aishdas.org
> http://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/avodah-aishdas.org
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.35/1040 - Release Date: 9/30/2007 9:01 PM
>