[Avodah] heter mechira produce - d'rabanan

[Richard Wolpoe]

On 10/1/07, Goldmeier <goldmeier at 012.net.il> wrote:
>
> so does that mean that when we take into account and mention how it is
> d'rabanan as a reason "l'hakel", we are dmisplaced and in error?
>
>
>
This is a logic flaw in the above pre-supposition...

Let's take 2 Cases:

   1. Explaining HOW a derabban MIGHT have an inherent humra
   2. Explaining How A Derabban MUST have an inherent humra

What I did was showed how poskim MIGHT treat Shemitta lehumra because it has
a d'orraisso foundation

You are now attmpting to show how poskim SHOULD or MUST treat a derabbanan
lehumra.
I never made  that demand upon poskim

I am only offering a rationale for what they have purportedly done already.

Example:
If you were to ask me - how come chicken requires a 6 -hour wait for diary
after all  it is only a derabbanan?
Then I might answer: "well it is an extentsion of a D'orasisso" and can be
treated as such

Then you could turn around and ask: Well what about Sfeik Bssar bechalav
derabbanan wtih chicken are we machmir like a D'orraiso?

I would answer that poskim do NOT treat that case strictly. The option to be
stricter in one aspect does not necessarily imply a requirement to be
stricter across the board

I hope this helps

-- 
Gmar Tov
Best Wishes for 5768,
RabbiRichWolpoe at Gmail.com
Please Visit:
http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/avodah-aishdas.org/attachments/20071001/38b930f8/attachment.htm>