[Avodah] Retzei

[Michael Kopinsky]

On 3/20/07, Jonathan Baker <jjbaker at panix.com> wrote:
>
> RMKop:
>
> > We are davening that HQBH will "Retzei b'amcha yisrael uvisfilasam", and
> > one day he will "hasheiv es ha'avodah lidvir beisecha," and THEN
> "v'ishei
> > yisrael us'filasam b'ahava s'kabeil b'ratzon." IOW, this is a
> > chronological progression
>
> > Why do none of the meforshim on siddur say this? (Caveat- I haven't
> looked
> > all the meforshim on this issue, but am being someich on (I think)
> > Artscroll's commentary which mentions only the two pshatim that RES
>
> More interestingly, why does Artscroll use the "chronological" inter-
> pretation when it's not brought in the MB's summary?


I should have been more clear.  The "chronological" interpretation is my own
chiddush.  I was someich on Artscroll re: the existence of the dichotomy of
shitos.

I didn't completely follow your presentation of the Tur, but it seems to be
similar to what I'm saying (without explicitly discussing the chronological
progression, but I don't think that's crucial).  Is there a significant
difference that I'm missing?

I don't have a MB on me now, but when I get a chance I'll look this up and
see if I mean the same thing as the Tur.

KT,
Michael
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/avodah-aishdas.org/attachments/20070320/d0634718/attachment-0002.htm>