[Avodah] dan lekaf zechus

Rich, Joel JRich at sibson.com
Mon Feb 26 03:05:30 PST 2007



On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 23:46:25 -0000 "Chana Luntz"
<chana at kolsassoon.org.uk> writes:

I said "Aside from how any allegations against an institution reflect on
its sponsors"

There is apparently some feeling here that the institution per se is
entitled to DLZ treatment.

Gershon
==================================================================
Let's say Reuvain and Shimon establish a real estate sales partnership.
Would you say one owes each of them to be DLZ on their individual sales
actions?  If so, would one evade this responsibility by speaking/acting
about "the partnership" rather than the individual?
KT
Joel Rich
THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE 
ADDRESSEE.  IT MAY CONTAIN PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL 
INFORMATION THAT IS EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE.  Dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this message by anyone other than the addressee is 
strictly prohibited.  If you received this message in error, please notify us 
immediately by replying: "Received in error" and delete the message.  
Thank you.




More information about the Avodah mailing list