[Avodah] establishing mamzerut
Jacob Farkas
jfarkas at compufar.com
Thu Nov 16 05:10:03 PST 2006
Rabbi Folger wrote:
> Once you assume that DNA is quasy faultless, it equals certainty. You no
> longer can claim that there is a reasonable interpretation of the
> presence of the bo'el's DNA in the child.
>
> Actually, I believe there is a reasonable interpretation which would
> suffice, and I am surprised that it wasn't suggested at the conference:
> the child might be the bo'el's and still not be a mamzer, since it could
> have been conveived by IUF, IVF etc.
>
Considering that Rov suggests it doesn't occur via IUF/IVF, wouldn't we
assume that Rov, especially since it is Ifshar leVareir if IUF/IVF occurred?
While DNA can establish a positive relationship between the child and
the child's "biological father," it does not address the method of
conception in any way, so all it does is place the Bo'el in the picture,
it identifies that he is the party. Any discussion of method of
conception is immaterial to the testimony of DNA, and is open to
standard methods of Birur, e.g. Rov, Hazaqah, Eidus.
So assuming that Rov conceptions are conventional, and DNA places the
Bo'el as the father, that could lead to identification of Mamzeirus. The
fact that a mi'ut could suggest an alternative is not a Rei'usa in the
Birur of DNA, it is its own question. We assume Mamzeirut if a woman
remarries without first obtaining a Get, and has a child. Maybe the
child was born of IUF/IVF?
--Jacob Farkas
More information about the Avodah
mailing list