[Avodah] Rambam on Prophecy
dfinch847 at aol.com
dfinch847 at aol.com
Tue Dec 12 16:21:31 PST 2006
R. Daniel Eidensohn writes:
"My suggestion is that the Rambam views the prophet in the same way as
we
view a mashgiach - in relationship to to a rosh yeshiva or a magid in
relationship to a rav. Someone who advises or suggest rather than
having
a position of leadership. Someone who is sensitive, wise and insightful
- but doesn't have political or decision making power. . . .
The Minchas Chinuch (#516) asserts that the Rambam only requires
obedience to a prophet when he says that Gd has commanded the action.
In
contrast the Chinuch seems to require that everything that a prophet
says must be obeyed."
I agree. Rambam was a rationalist who, according to one commentator,
viewed prophecy as a projection of the human intellect. Yehudah ha-Levi
and others saw prophecy as a supernatural gift. By Rambam, the prophet
is a prescient intellectual who would know when to invoke G-d's command
and when to invoke the lesser province of reason and argument. By
ha-Levi, the prophet may be a charismatic tzaddik who speaks for HaShem
automatically.
David S. Finch
dfinch847 at aol.com
The information contained in this communication is intended only for
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from
disclosure under applicable law. If the reader is not the intended
recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify the sender at dfinch847 at aol.com. Thank you.
======================================================
-----Original Message-----
From: avodah-request at lists.aishdas.org
To: avodah at lists.aishdas.org
Sent: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 4:22 PM
Subject: Avodah Digest, Vol 5, Issue 6
Send Avodah mailing list submissions to
avodah at lists.aishdas.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/avodah-aishdas.org
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
avodah-request at lists.aishdas.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
avodah-owner at lists.aishdas.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Avodah digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Prophet - mashgiach or godol hador? (Micha Berger)
2. Fwd: Kissing Places In A Sefer Torah (SBA)
3. Eidut (Shoshana L. Boublil)
4. Yaakov's division of his family into two camps
(Elchanan Schulgasser)
5. Re: Yaakov's division of his family into two camps
(Moshe Yehuda Gluck)
6. Re: [Areivim] Halachic Infertility, or, Abolishing Shivah
Neki'im (Micha Berger)
7. Re: Prophet - mashgiach or godol hador? (Daniel Eidensohn)
8. Fwd: Reminder - Monday evening begin Prayer forRain (Aryeh Stein)
9. Re: [Areivim] URL: article about halachic infertility and
proposed changes to hilchos nidah (Zev Sero)
10. Halachic Infertility, or, Abolishing Shivah Neki'im (Ilana Sober)
11. Re: [Areivim] Halachic Infertility, or, Abolishing Shivah
Neki'im (Rich, Joel)
12. Re: Prophet - mashgiach or godol hador? (Daniel Eidensohn)
13. Halachic justification for short sleeves (Moshe Feldman)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 14:26:13 -0500 (EST)
From: "Micha Berger" <micha at aishdas.org>
Subject: Re: [Avodah] Prophet - mashgiach or godol hador?
To: "A High-Level Torah Discussion Group" <avodah at lists.aishdas.org>
Message-ID:
<35480.171.159.192.10.1165605973.squirrel at webmail.aishdas.org>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
I didn't yet read RDE's post, nor this recent e-shiur from YHE (by R'
Eli
Hadad). But I think the two are related
<http://vbm-torah.org/archive/rambam/07rambam.htm>.
On the web page (which I got as email), all I noticed was a chart which
indicates that a good king receives an overflow of imagination (really
koach
hadimyon, I presume), and a good philosopher receives an overflow of
intellect, but a navi has gotten an overflow of both.
I just wanted to send this out before Shabbos, so that people (perhaps
only
the single-email subscribers) can print up the web page and read it.
Tir'u baTov!
-mi
--
Micha Berger Spirituality is like a bird: if you tighten
micha at aishdas.org your grip on it, it chokes; slacken your grip,
http://www.aishdas.org and it flies away.
Fax: (270) 514-1507 - Rav Yisrael Salanter
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:04:15 +1100
From: "SBA" <sba at sba2.com>
Subject: [Avodah] Fwd: Kissing Places In A Sefer Torah
To: "avodah" <avodah at lists.aishdas.org>
Cc: RallisW at aol.com
Message-ID: <01f301c71c10$44933120$0301010a at sbaws1nnv993q7>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252";
reply-type=original
From: RallisW at aol.com
Does anyone know where the Lubavitch minhog of touching one's tzitzis
to
both the begining and end of an Aliyoh comes from?
>>
Presumably you are referring to sweeping the Tallis over the
section being layned - before and after the brochos.
AFAIK, this is not an excludive Lubavitch minhag, but done by all.
See Shaarei Efrayim (Shaar 4:3 - and also mentioned in 4:17
giving a reason for it) saying that it is a 'minhag vasikin'.
However it seems to mention this only before the first brocho -
and not the last.
The Munkatcher Rav zt'l in his Nimukei OCh (s.139) strongly
disapproves of this, vezeh leshono:
"...aderaba gorem harbeh kilkul leST..." and
"...kamo pe'amim biseforov hayekorim mevi minhagim she'einom
rak minhag am haaretz me'iroy...bimechilas kevod Toroso...gormo
lehachriv harbeh ST ulemoch'kon ad sh'hevion liy'dei psul, Hashem
yatzileinu.."
SBA
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:00:39 +0200
From: "Shoshana L. Boublil" <toramada at bezeqint.net>
Subject: [Avodah] Eidut
To: <avodah at lists.aishdas.org>
Message-ID: <027001c71c63$932eb400$0200a8c0 at p4>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Halachically, is a victim of a crime supposed to go to a Beit Din and
report the
crime?
Does it change things if he knows who performed the crime?
Does it change things if he doesn't have a witness to back him up vs.
if he has
a witness to back up his claims?
Is reporting the crime part of mitzvat Eidut? If a witness to the
crime does
not come forward, is this a transgression of Mitzvat Eidut? of "Lo
Ta'amod Al
Dam"? or is he guilty of Lashon HaRa if he is the sole witness?
When we say that we need two witnesses, do the witnesses have to come
together?
Do they have to know about the existence of each other?
Shoshana L. Boublil
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 14:24:32 -0500
From: "Elchanan Schulgasser" <mechina at gmail.com>
Subject: [Avodah] Yaakov's division of his family into two camps
To: avodah at lists.aishdas.org
Message-ID:
<1ec531f00612101124x5ed7cb61rbedbc33d05986ee9 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Does anyone know how Yaakov Avinu divided his family before his
encounter
with Eisav? I looked around a bit but couldn't find anyone who addresses
this specific question (although there's an intriguing Ohr HaChaim
HaKadosh
which explains that he armed one camp and left one unarmed, ibid.)
Some suggestions might be:
Rachel in one camp, Leah in the other, each with her respective
shifchah.
Leah in one camp, the other wives in the other camp (balance of numbers)
Representatives from each maternal family in each camp (to preserve
elements
of each family if one camp is wiped out.)
Etc.
Has anyone seen a p'shat?
Elchanan Schulgasser
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/avodah-aishdas.org/attachments/2006121
0/adc0ae8b/attachment.html
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:25:35 -0500
From: "Moshe Yehuda Gluck" <mgluck at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Avodah] Yaakov's division of his family into two camps
To: "'A High-Level Torah Discussion Group'" <avodah at lists.aishdas.org>
Message-ID: <01b701c71caa$1e706950$2e01a8c0 at acercc4ab20404>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
R' Elchanan Schulgasser:
Does anyone know how Yaakov Avinu divided his family before his
encounter
with Eisav? I looked around a bit but couldn't find anyone who addresses
this specific question (although there's an intriguing Ohr HaChaim
HaKadosh
which explains that he armed one camp and left one unarmed, ibid.)
<snip>
To add to the question, it seems that when Eisav finally did arrive,
Ya'akov's whole family was there to greet him. What, then, was the
point of
dividing them earlier?
KT,
MYG
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:58:08 -0500 (EST)
From: "Micha Berger" <micha at aishdas.org>
Subject: Re: [Avodah] [Areivim] Halachic Infertility, or, Abolishing
Shivah Neki'im
To: avodah at aishdas.org
Message-ID:
<23096.171.159.192.10.1165852688.squirrel at webmail.aishdas.org>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
On Mon, December 11, 2006 4:57 am, R Moshe Yehuda Gluck wrote to
Areivim:
: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/798797.html
For a more serious discussion, see
<http://www.yoatzot.org/article/77> -- Halachic Infertility - Diagnosis
<http://www.yoatzot.org/article/63> -- Treatment
There are ways of shortening the time until a hefseiq taharah as well.
But if
all else fails, there have been pesaqim lequlah -- at least before IVF.
Now
that a couple can produce a baby without violating minhag yisrael, as
IVF-H
involves simpler halachic issues (donation for the purpose of
procreation)
than eliminating 7 neqiim, I do not know if those teshuvos are still
applied.
But finding a doctor who wants to do away with minhag yisrael
altogether is
just a Haaretzism, and an Areivim discussion if anywhere.
Tir'u baTov!
-mi
--
Micha Berger Spirituality is like a bird: if you tighten
micha at aishdas.org your grip on it, it chokes; slacken your grip,
http://www.aishdas.org and it flies away.
Fax: (270) 514-1507 - Rav Yisrael Salanter
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:35:58 +0200
From: Daniel Eidensohn <yadmoshe at 012.net.il>
Subject: Re: [Avodah] Prophet - mashgiach or godol hador?
To: David Riceman <driceman at worldnet.att.net>, avodah
<avodah at lists.aishdas.org>
Message-ID: <457D96FE.2030600 at 012.net.il>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
R' David Riceman wrote:
>
> How do you deal with all the places in Tanach where the prophet
> intervenes in politics, or, for example, the Rambam's example in the
> introduction to PHM where the prophet commands people to fight a
> battle on Shabbat?
>
Intervening in politics i.e., making prophetic pronouncments that
impact
society or government is not being a political leader. Commanding
people
to fight on Shabbos is also not an example of leadership. I think there
were only two prophets who could qualify as leaders Moshe and Shmuel.
In
fact they were both viewed as Prophet-Kings. The other prophets did not
serve the same function. I have not seen any statement of the Rambam
that he considers prophets to be leaders.
Regarding the article from VBM by Rav Hadad who states that: " It
seems
that Maimonides wishes to use this comparison to demonstrate that a
prophet is a combination of a philosopher and a political leader." He
cites no evidence at all for this hypothesis and I am not aware of any
sources that justify it.
Daniel Eidensohn
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:41:10 -0500
From: "Aryeh Stein" <aesrusk at gmail.com>
Subject: [Avodah] Fwd: Reminder - Monday evening begin Prayer forRain
To: avodah at aishdas.org
Message-ID:
<ecbad29b0612110441j3bf846c1qb02a0fd69ac02fc at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
[from Areivim]
>>>It's the old minnek in general (as so often...). The "ve-imru
omein" seems to have crept in from the end of gantz kaddish both to
Eloukai netzour and the end of benshen. It doesn't make sense unless
it's said to somebody else, does it?>>>
============================================
I'm pretty sure we've discussed this on Avodah before, but RSZA
explains that when we say "v'imru amen" in our silent shemonah esrai,
we are asking the malachim (who escort us everywhere we go) to answer
amen.
KT and GS,
Aryeh
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:11:51 -0500
From: Zev Sero <zev at sero.name>
Subject: Re: [Avodah] [Areivim] URL: article about halachic
infertility and proposed changes to hilchos nidah
To: Avodah <avodah at aishdas.org>
Message-ID: <457D8347.9010900 at sero.name>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/798797.html
> Within this situation is a failure of internal logic: It is
> unreasonable that a ruling that derives from a humra of Jewish women
> will produce a conflict with the first commandment in the Torah - to
> be fruitful and multiply.
Has this man never heard of "shev ve'al taaseh"? Does he hear shofar
on RH which is on shabbat?
In any case, both women and men are obligated by the laws of nidah and
zivah, while only men are obligated by pru urvu, which means that the
woman would have to break a law, even if only a light derabanan, in
order for her husband to fulfil a mitzvah; this reduces the question
to the already-solved one of rediyat hapat, where the psak is that
"we do not tell one person to sin so that another person will benefit".
(The chumra of 7 nekiyim seems analogous to the issur of rediyat hapat,
which is not even a shevut; and the benefit to the second party in this
case is only an asei, rather than being saved from an issur karet. So
it seems to me to be a kal vachomer.)
(And that's leaving aside the consideration that if the husband is so
concerned about the mitzvah he can fulfil it with another woman.)
--
Zev Sero Something has gone seriously awry with this
Court's
zev at sero.name interpretation of the Constitution.
- Clarence Thomas
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:28:46 -0500
From: "Ilana Sober" <sober at pathcom.com>
Subject: [Avodah] Halachic Infertility, or, Abolishing Shivah Neki'im
To: <areivim at lists.aishdas.org>, <avodah at lists.aishdas.org>
Message-ID: <006a01c71d52$31df73c0$3202a8c0 at MainMachine>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Moderators - this thread started on Areivim so I'm cc'ing both lists -
feel
free to reject from Areivim.
The seven clean days requirement is based on a SAFEK D'ORAITA. We can no
longer distinguish niddah from zivah, because we have lost the mesorah
of
which precise four shades of red and one of black render a woman niddah
d'oraita. This makes it impossible to pinpoint the halachic onset of
bleeding, which means we can no longer keeep an accurate niddah-zivah
calendar. Based on this safek d'oraita, a woman needs to count six clean
days whenever she experiences ANY bleeding, and seven clean days when
she
bleeds for at least three days. This is the takanah of Rebbi baSadot.
The
chumra of b'not yisra'el, cited by Rabbi Zeira, is actually a rather a
small
extension of that decree - she counts an extra clean day even if she
bleeds
only for one or two days, so that she consistently counts seven no
matter
what.
Dr. Rosenak sounds unusually cautious in his attitude towards hormones.
I
cannot tell you how many kallot I have met who have been using birth
control
pills since adolescence for acne, painful periods, and who knows what
else.
Physicians are usually quite willing to prescribe hormones for
"lifestyle"
concerns, and I don't know why religious concerns should be any less
serious.
In any case, physicians have no more business paskening halacha (which
requires a level of knowledge and shikul daat that Dr. Rosenak seems
unable
even to conceive of - "research" is insufficient) than rabbis do
prescribing
hormones. I am glad he trembles at the risk of a stroke from hormones
(IIUC,
this risk is statistically quite low, especially with proper advance
screening for risk factors). Does he also tremble at the risk of
violating
an issur karet if a woman who halachically really is a zavah immerses
without the shivah neki'im?
The problem of halachic infertility should certainly not be minimized.
Fundamentally, it is a result of churban, galut, the lack of a
sanhedrin,
etc. No - the halachic system is not perfect and even causes suffering.
Dr.
Rosenak is correct that in this case, as in others, the problem is not
that
G-d designed an imperfect system, but that the system has deteriorated.
He
misidentifies the cause of the deterioration as "the rabbis." The cause
of
the deterioration is churban and galut - the rabbis are those who saved
the
system from total disintegration. Perhaps, rather than secretly
breathing a
sigh of relief that we are no longer burdened with primitive practices
like
animal sacrifice, we should take note of the broader implications of
churban.
Yh"r sheyibaneh beit hamikdash bimhera b'yamenu.
Note: Any woman who suspects she has halachic infertility should confirm
that she is, in fact, ovulating early. Ovulation tests are commercially
available. If this does turn out to be the problem, there are some
halachic
interventions that should be tried before medical interventions such as
hormones.
1) Asking a she'elah on attempts at a hefsek as early as day four/five
(see
#2) - making sure that the Rav is aware of the halachic infertility
problem.
A hefsek does not have to be pure white!!! Some browns are in fact
permissible, especially b'shaat hadchak. Similarly, questions should be
asked about any other problematic stains or bedikot during shivah
neki'im.
2) Asking a she'elah about reducing the minimum days before shivah
neki'im
from five to four, even for Ashkenazim. In extreme situations, it may be
possible to devise strategies for further reduction if bleeding stops
early
enough.
- Ilana
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:18:46 -0500
From: "Rich, Joel" <JRich at Segalco.com>
Subject: Re: [Avodah] [Areivim] Halachic Infertility, or, Abolishing
Shivah Neki'im
To: "A High-Level Torah Discussion Group" <avodah at lists.aishdas.org>
Message-ID:
<7F5EC37AC45DE64DB56C8AD3D409C2B2C4FE9C at NYCEXCL01.segal.segalco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
On Mon, December 11, 2006 4:57 am, R Moshe Yehuda Gluck wrote to
Areivim:
: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/798797.html
For a more serious discussion, see
<http://www.yoatzot.org/article/77> -- Halachic Infertility - Diagnosis
<http://www.yoatzot.org/article/63> -- Treatment
There are ways of shortening the time until a hefseiq taharah as well.
But if all else fails, there have been pesaqim lequlah -- at least
before IVF. Now that a couple can produce a baby without violating
minhag yisrael, as IVF-H involves simpler halachic issues (donation for
the purpose of procreation) than eliminating 7 neqiim, I do not know if
those teshuvos are still applied.
But finding a doctor who wants to do away with minhag yisrael altogether
is just a Haaretzism, and an Areivim discussion if anywhere.
Tir'u baTov!
-mi
==========================================
I thought the issue was the additional 5 days, not the 7 neqiim. IIRC
except for lo plug (I know that's a big except) there could be
circumstances where the logic of all the extra 5 days would not apply.
I'm also curious about your calculus of "simpler halachik issues", I
agree that the vast majority of contemporary poskim allow it in cases of
infertility. IIRC at least some say there is no kiyum of pru urvu
("just" shevet) and in theory they are "allowing" the infertility
argument to overcome haschatat zera and identification of parents'
concerns.
What if a woman's cycle were such that if we shortened the 5 to 4 she
could get pregnant. I'm guessing that using some of the possibilities
alluded to above, a posek might well say not to go ivf but rely on such
a kula (especially given the cost of IVF).
Of course my memory on these items may be patchy, lmaaseh , and
especially in print, my recollection is that these types of issues are
all covered under consult your LOR.
KT
THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE
ADDRESSEE. IT MAY CONTAIN PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION THAT IS EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE. Dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message by anyone other than the
addressee is
strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please
notify us
immediately by replying: "Received in error" and delete the message.
Thank you.
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:20:46 +0200
From: Daniel Eidensohn <yadmoshe at 012.net.il>
Subject: Re: [Avodah] Prophet - mashgiach or godol hador?
To: David Riceman <driceman at worldnet.att.net>, Avodah
<avodah at lists.aishdas.org>
Message-ID: <457EE4EE.7080500 at 012.net.il>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
R' David Riceman wrote:
> From: "Daniel Eidensohn" <yadmoshe at 012.net.il>
>
>> Intervening in politics i.e., making prophetic pronouncments that
>> impact society or government is not being a political leader.
>
> This distinction is too subtle for me. Could you give a concrete
> example of something the Rambam would think inappropriate for a
> prophet and the Ramban would think appropriate?
My suggestion is that the Rambam views the prophet in the same way as
we
view a mashgiach - in relationship to to a rosh yeshiva or a magid in
relationship to a rav. Someone who advises or suggest rather than
having
a position of leadership. Someone who is sensitive, wise and insightful
- but doesn't have political or decision making power. In contrast a
king or political leader is not necessary wise or sensitive but he
makes
the decisions and sees that they are implemented. While there are times
when the prophet has a specific message or action that is required -
but
he is not a leader. In contrast we today view our gedollim as being
endowed with ruach hakodesh.
A specific example is that the Rambam does not allow the involvement of
ruach hakodesh in the Sanhedrin while the Ramban does. The Divrei Chaim
clearly states that each generations leaders are qualified by their
ruach hakodesh. Prophecy or ruach hakodesh seems to be an essential
characteristic for those who reject the Rambam's understanding of
prophecy and ruach hakodesh.
Another distinguishing factor between the Rambam's concept and others
is
whether the prophet must be obeyed in everything he says or just what
he
says in G-d's name.
Chinuch(516): We are commanded to listen to all the prophets in all
that
they command us to do. They are to be obeyed even if they tell us to
temporarily do something against one of the mitzvos of the Torah or
even
many of them - except for idol worship. Since he is a true prophet all
his intentions are for the good and whatever he does it is to
strenghten
the religion and the belief in G?d. This is clearly stated in the Torah
(Devarim 18:15) and is explained in the Sifre (175). The basis of this
mitzva is that the ultimate level that a man can achieve is that of a
prophecy. Furthermore for a human being in this world, prophecy is the
highest level of knowledge of the truth possible. It is knowledge that
is not open to dispute since it comes from the fountain of truth
itself.
Few people achieve the level of development that is required to reach
prophecy. The ladder needed to reach it is immense with its feet on the
earth and its top in the heavens. Who is the man with the proper fear
of
G?d who has the merit to ascend G?d's mountain and stand in His holy
place? Only one of hundreds of thousands of men achieves this level and
only in a generation that is deserving of it. Therefore the Torah
commanded us that one who in fact achieves this ultimate level of human
achievement and he is known to us as having the spiritual qualities and
conduct of a true prophet ? he is to be obeyed in all that he commands.
That is because he is the one who knows the way of truth and therefore
he will guide us in it. We should not be so arrogant as to defy his
words and to disagree with him because any dispute with him on any
matter is a total error and can only be because of the lack of
knowledge
of the truth.
The Minchas Chinuch (#516) asserts that the Rambam only requires
obedience to a prophet when he says that Gd has commanded the action.
In
contrast the Chinuch seems to require that everything that a prophet
says must be obeyed.
Daniel Eidensohn
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:14:42 +0200
From: "Moshe Feldman" <moshe.feldman at gmail.com>
Subject: [Avodah] Halachic justification for short sleeves
To: <avodah at aishdas.org>
Message-ID: <01a001c71dde$b8d301d0$0300a8c0 at IBM714E412E5F9>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Shu"t Bnei Banim III:26 par. 4 writes the following "limud zchus" on
women
who wear short sleeves:
The Gemara Kesubos 72b writes that a woman who knits in public and
shows her
elbows while doing so violates das yehudis. The Gemara Gittin 90a
refers to
a woman who knits in public and who is "fruma m'shnei tzdadeha," which
Rashi
interprets as: one can see her armpits [MF: through the openings in her
sleeves]. He also cites the Teferes Shmuel on the Rosh Berachos 3:33,
and
Divrei Chamudos there, and Yerushalmi [Gittin ch. 9 halacha 11] who
make the
same point. He then argues that the das yehudis is violated only if
one can
see the armpits [through the openings in her sleeves], which occurs
today
only when a woman wears a sleeveless dress.
I have a different limud zechus, based on the fact that showing elbows
is
considered das yehudis. Many years ago, I heard a shiur from Rav
Mordechai
Willig (whom I believe was speaking in the name of RYBS) about shok
b'isha
erva. He noted that there is a machlokes achronim (Chazon Ish vs.
Mishneh
Berurah) whether the shok goes to the knee or to the bottom of the
foot. He
said (IIRC based on a comparison to the location of shok in animals)
that
there is a good argument that shok refers to the bottom of the foot, but
nevertheless, the gemara was not listing only places which are
objectively
erva (in all societies), but even places which are "subjectively"
erva-i.e.,
because people in the time of the gemara had the minhag to cover them,
they
have the din of mekomos ha'muchusim. However, in our time, when women
do
not cover to the bottom of the leg, that part is not considered
"subjective"
erva. It would seem that the same reasoning should apply to elbows
(esp. as
Bnei Banim notes that elbows are further from the makom erva than legs
are).
I also note that Rashi Kesubos 72a explains "das yehudis" as "what women
were noheg even though it's not written." It would therefore make sense
that das yehudis should be fluid and depend on the way women dress in
any
particular locale. I admit that theoretically, one could argue that
once
something becomes das yehudis, it never loses that status, but from a
historical perspective, such an argument would be hard to make: it seems
that in the time of the Shulchan Aruch, single women covered their hair
(as
is customary by Arab women today), yet that is not done today. (The
Magen
Avraham argues that the Torah merely requires that hair be braided, but
that
does not deal with the fact that in practice, single "bnos yisrael"
used to
cover their hair.)
I wrote the following at
http://www.aishdas.org/avodah/vol06/v06n075.shtml#17:
) I believe that R Ovadia Yosef proves pretty convincingly that
) sheitels violated daas yehudis in the time of the gemara--the Aruch
says
) that Kapaltin (the word used in the Yerushalmi instead of Kalsa, used
by
the
) Bavli) means a wig in Latin (lashon Romi). (My father told me that
) capilitium means little hair, or something like that.) The Shiltei
) Hagiborim is shver (and I've read lots of the tshuvos--both pro and
con
) dealing with the SHG).
) My chiddush on what ROY says is that because sheitels are in the
realm of
) daas yehudis, society can decide to be meikel against the gemara's
) standards.
Has anyone heard whether Rav Lichtenstein says about short sleeves? (I
heard third-hand rumors, but would like to confirm them.)
Kol tuv,
Moshe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: winmail.dat
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 6594 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/avodah-aishdas.org/attachments/2006121
2/0a1775ca/attachment.bin
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Avodah mailing list
Avodah at lists.aishdas.org
http://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/avodah-aishdas.org
End of Avodah Digest, Vol 5, Issue 6
************************************
________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and
security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from
across the web, free AOL Mail and more.
More information about the Avodah
mailing list