[Aspaqlaria] Aspaqlaria

[Aspaqlaria]

Aspaqlaria

///////////////////////////////////////////
What is Mussar?
 
Posted: 31 Jan 2008 08:58 AM CST
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Aspaqlaria/~3/226587632/what-is-mussar.shtml


Rav Yisrael Salanters 125th yahrzeit begins tonight (25 Shevat), and while searching for grist for that mill for an appropriate entry, some Avodah discussion sparked some thoughts.

Foundation Stories

There are two foundation stories about the birth of the Mussar Movement (which should not be confused with mussar as a whole).

The first is where a young Yisrael Lipkin used to follow R Zundel Salanter around. Rav Zundel wanted to live privately, secretly, so Rav Yisrael had to sneak around to watch the actions of this baal mussar. One time, he followed Rav Zundel into the woods, where Rav Zundel engaged in passionate hispaalus (pouring out his soul with lips aflame). (No, this really isnt a Breslov story) Suddenly, Rav Zundel turned around, made eye contact, and instructed, Yisrael! Lern mussar zal tzuzain a yarei Shamayim!  Learn mussar so that you will be one who lives in awe of [the One in] Heaven! In Nesivos Or it writes that Rav Yisrael Salanter called the moment a thunderbolt that changed his life.

The second was a time on Yom Kippur when Rav Yisrael didnt have a machzor with him. At one point he got lost, and needed to peer over the other persons shoulder. He got shoved in response to his efforts. How dare you shterr my kavanah (harm my concentration)! At that point Rav Yisrael realized that he couldnt keep Mussar to himself, and had to share it with the world.

Hold onto those, Ill get back to them.

So to ask again: What is mussar?

Im going to answer that with a set of three triads.

First Triad

There are three ways to see the relationship between tiqun hamiddos (repairing the dimensions of ones personality traits) and halakhah. They are far from mutually exclusive.

1- The Rambams Hilkhos Deios describes the obligations specific to personality. They are obligations among other halakhahs other obligations.

2- Without tiqun hamiddos, one is incapable of making the right decisions at the actual time one is faced with a choice. It is the means by which one is capable of following halakhah to an ever greater extent. Mussar is a central component to Judaism, but logically inferior to halakhah.

While the first notion is universal, for even the gemara asserts (for example) whomever loses their temper it is as though they worshiped idols, this one is only nearly universal. It is not consistent with some forms of Chassidus. Chassidus is inherently experiential in nature. Breslov argues that trying to over-analyze or work at it would actually get in the way of the experience.

3- The entire purpose of halakhah is to achieve sheleimus haadam (completeness of the person), to finish Hashems creation  let us make man in our image. The use of plural can be taken to include both Hashem and the person himself. Perfection of the image of G-d which by definition must be self made  as He is. Thus, all of halakhah is an exercise in tiqun hamiddos. Halakhah is logically a consequence of Mussar.

And it is fair to assert that the two to coexist symbioticly, seeing mussar is the only way to fully follow halakhah and seeing halakhah as the critical means of achieving mussars goal. Two sides of one integral whole.

This notion is far from universal  its the sheleimus (personal wholeness) fork in the road of Jewish philosophy. Chassidus took the other route, deveiqus (cleaving to G-d). Others have argued non-personal perfection as a goal  perfection of society, or of the Jewish community. And Brisk would argue against the entire concept of defining goals; halakhah must be understood on its own terms.

Second triad: A rebbe chaveir of mine, R Dr Ephraim Becker, describes mussar (in the third sense of the previous triad) as a three part thing:

- There is the real, knowing where one stands

- There is the ideal, knowing where the Creator wants us to be

- There is the process of getting from the real to the ideal

There is an interesting contrast in book titles. When R Yaakov Hillel wrote a book on Jewish philosophy, he called it Ascending Jacobs Ladder. When Dr Alan Morinis documented his path back to classical Judaism by studying Mussar under R Yechiel Perr he titled his book Climbing Jacobs Ladder. (Rabbi Perr is the rosh yeshiva of Derech Ayson, Far Rockaway NY, and scion of Novhardok three different ways.) Ascending, with no mention of work, vs climbing.

To go to primary sources, note that Rav Zundel Salanter told the future Rav Yisrael Salanter zal tzuzain a yarei Shamayim  not to gain awareness of the significance of the One in heaven, but to become the kind of person who has such awareness. As I wrote above, Chassidus tries for deveiqus. The Mussar Movement asserted that one must try to become kind of person capable of deveiqus. There could be no other reason why deveiqus isnt achieved. Hashem would leave no break between Him and us. The break is between us and ourselves.

It is this notion of process, of climbing  literally shteigin  that is of value within nearly all derakhim, all paths, all approaches to the Torah. And thus lower case m, not specifically the Mussar Movement. The different derakhim define the ideal by stressing different aspects of it. Which will in turn suggests different paths, thus the name derakhim. But using tools to become the kind of person who can follow that path, to consciously pursue that derekhs perspective on the end-goal, makes sense according to any derekh.

Third Triad

Note that the story with Rav Zundel portrays mussar as the route to becoming a yarei Shamayim. The one about the man who wouldnt share his machzor for a moment focuses on his being so enraptured in Yom Kippurs theme of teshuvah he neglects a central part of that  his relationship to the person standing next to him. It tells of the need to refocus the masses who were increasingly looking to rite, to defend our self-definition as Reform tried to tear it away. Following along the tefillah on Yom Kippur to the exclusion of more fundamental mitzvos. And that second theme is central to how R Yisrael is portrayed; most of the stories told about him are about being stringent in interpersonal mitzvos over common stringencies in mitzvos between man and the Omnipresent.

Mussar is also very centrally a third theme  tiqun hamiddos. (Thus completing our last triad.) Whether its Mesilas Yesharims working up the ladder of middos up to divine inspiration or Cheshbon haNefeshs list of middos that have more interpersonal implications. And this is true even in the Hilkhos Deios sense of Mussar, never mind the approaches in the first triad that make tiqun hamiddos even more central.

We can view the goals of the Mussar Movement as creating a holistic Jew, one who works on his relationship with the Creator, with other people, and with himself. And compared to where the other man in shul and his ilk stood, that means a greater stress on interpersonal and intrapersonal (bein adam lenafsho, between man and his soul, as the Gra put it) mizvos than one sees in other paths to serving the A-lmighty. And if thats true of 19th cent Lithuania, its even more true of todays society, with its providing grist for chumrah of the month club jokes.

That would explain why Rav Yisrael is so associated with stories stressing the interpersonal. Had the Judaism of his day been more centered on that, the stories retold about him would be about prayer, etc E.g. the Mussar Movement promoted tefillah behispaalus; a minyan no less passionate (and possibly no quieter) than anything found among Karliner chassidim.

Mussar Today

Using the real-ideal-path concept:

Rav Kook taught a philosophy.  He therefore defines an ideal, but no way to become the kind of person who can live up to it. For that matter, Rav Samson Raphael Hirsch doesnt either. Rav Hirsch is closer to the Mussar Movement in ideal  both aim at a refined Jew. Different focuses on refinement, but its no coincidence both Slabodka and Hirschs Torah im Derekh Eretz produced well groomed, secularly informed, doers. But Rav Hirsch didnt discuss the means to get there.

Mussar in the loose sense is encapsulated in the notion of finding and following a path from the real me to the ideal me. It requires belief that tiqun hamiddos is a prerequisite for being able to follow halakhah. (In shorthand: Embracing the first triad, real-ideal-path, and at least the second but also possibly all three positions about the role of mussar in a halachic life.)

This kind of Mussar can therefore be applied within most derakhim. One can live by Rav Hirschs definition of the ideal or the Tanyas and still seek to transform oneself into the kind of person who better lives that ideal.

And it is in that sense that AishDas strives to promote mussar.

Mussar in the sense of the Mussar Movement requires embracing all three triads in full: adopting the notion that sheleimus haadam is the entire tachlis of the Torah, perfecting our tzelem E-lokim. And being whole can only be possible with full attention to all three relationships. Thus Rav Yisrael was lead to balancing all three of Shimon haTzadiqs pillars (Avos 1:2) equally: Torahs perfection of the self, Avodas Hashem, and Gemillus Chassadim toward others.

Notice what Im excluding. I dont see the darkness and harshness of the early Mussar Movement, with a focus on the evils of the yeitzer hara, keeping in mind the day of ones death, the dark candle-lit room, etc as defining for the Mussar Movement. Rather, mussar inherently is very subject to knowing where you are. And therefore, the same era that created the stereotype fire-n-brimstone preacher called for a very dark mussar. Its as unfair to judge it from where we stand as it is to judge the role of tokhachah in contemporary Sepharadic maggidim.

And thus, the Mussar Movement had to repackage itself repeatedly as people changed. Slabodkas Gadlus haAdam is no less part of the Mussar Movement even if it dovetails well with contemporary Human Potential talk. (The Alters Yahrzeit is just four days away, on the 29th of Shevat.) And Rav Shelomo Wolbe (who is somewhat less of the movement, since it was really a casualty of Hitler) wrote in the 1970s about the need to focus on planting and building (to quote the title of his seifer on parenting) rather than pruning. Carrots, not sticks, are what work for todays Jew.

What killed Mussar? Mussar never survived the end of East European Jewrys golden era. But why not, whereas Chassidus is rebuilding itself?

Two yeshiva students noticed that of all the Slabodka graduates who built post-War yeshivos, only R Dovid Leibowitz (founding Rosh Yeshiva of Yeshivas Chofetz Chaim) strived to build a mussar yeshiva. Not R Aharon Kotler, R Yaakov Kamenecki, Rav Hutner, Rav Kahaneman, etc, etc, etc They actually went around the US asking these rashei yeshiva why. Rav Hutners answer is telling. He felt that the American student couldnt handle the long work that real change requires. Rav Hutner therefore chose the more modest goal (in his opinion) of inspiring them with the Maharals thought.

It is easy to be inspired by ideals. The trick is staring at the details, the step-by-step work, and still following through. And so todays generation of Israeli Orthodox seekers find a home in some chulent Rav Kooks and the Tanyas philosophy and Breslover experiences and Carlebach minyanim. They do not search for a program, a plan for getting from here to there. In the US, Carlebachian Neo-Chassidus is popular because it provides inspiring experiences without that demand of the day-to-day attention to detail and following a spiritual discipline that defies Americas love of the quick fix. Rav Hutner, in the founding years of the American Orthodox community of today, thought all we can do is inspire people toward the ideal and hope for the best without conscious work or a plan to get there.

Given the increasing lack of a holistic, three pillar, approach to Yahadus, demonstrating a real need for mussar, and the greater strength of the community and its educational system today providing opportunity, I believe we have a sizable population ready to work for something better. To set out and build idealists  of all the various ways we have formulated the Torahs ideals.
 


--
You are subscribed to email updates from "Aspaqlaria."
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubcribe now http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailunsub?id=4187981&key=cQD876uioH 

If you prefer to unsubscribe via postal mail, write to: Aspaqlaria, c/o FeedBurner, 549 W Randolph, Chicago IL USA 60661

This Email Delivery powered by FeedBurner.
	
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/aspaqlaria-aishdas.org/attachments/20080131/cb3a7163/attachment-0002.htm>