[Aspaqlaria] Aspaqlaria

[Aspaqlaria]

Aspaqlaria

///////////////////////////////////////////
Sipur
 
Posted: 18 Apr 2008 12:54 PM CDT
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Aspaqlaria/~3/273055952/sipur.shtml


There are three words for counting that factor prominently in the Torah.

Parashas Pequdei gets its name from Moshe Rabbeinus accounting of all the material collected for the mishkan. The root \פקד\ has three meanings altogether:

To count out inventory
To remember, veHashem padas es Sarah kaasher amar  and Hashem remembered Sarah [so that she could conceive Yitzchaq, as He said.. (It is worth comparing this usage of paqad with zachar.)
To appoint, as in Yoseifs method for running Egypts storehouses - vayafqeid peqidim.


I point this out in relationship to another root used to mean counting, \ספר\, which also has three meanings. This is mentioned in Seifer haYetzirah, discussed by the Kuzari (4:25), and is the reason why the 10 sefiros are called sefiros. It can mean:

Counting, as in mispar (number)


To cut  from which we get sapar (barber) and misparayim (scissors)
To tell, lesapeir, or a book seifer


There is also a third word used for counting, but we only find it with respect to counting people. In parshios  Beamidbar and Naso, Hashem commands Moshe nasa es rosh  count the heads.

What is the difference between counting in the sense of /pqd/ or nasa, and counting as denoted by lispor?

Parashas Nasos counting comes immediately before a discussion of the nesiim  a term from the same root meaning the head of a sheivet (tribe). The word reuse would seem to indicate that this, like pqd, is about appointments. In both cases, were looking at individuals as individuals, and pointing out their distinct role.  A paqid is given a special duty, just as a nasi is, and just as you can emphasize the worth of each individual, raise their heads when ou count them, you can show the destination of each item donated when you make an accounting. Which would also explain the meaning of to remember one particular person rather than letting her remain part of the whole.

Lesapeir, however, is to cut. The items being counted are counted as pieces of the whole. The story isnt simply being said over (lehagid) one must spell out each element. The verbal step of the seider may be called maggid, but the mitzvah of the night, which goes beyond the verbal into the foods of matzah and maror, of re experiencing the tears of karpas and the joys of Hallel, is sippur yetzias Mitzrayim.

Lesapeir sipur isnt to give a one sentence summary: There was a car accident. Its to divide that one thesis into its parts, telling detail. So and so got a call on his cell phone. He was distracted, and didnt notice the car making a right turn . Thus the connection to cutting.

It is not coincidental that this is in pedagogic question-and-answer form, a teaching format. Because thats lesapeir. When the last of the prophets needed to organize the Torah into a format usable even as prophecy ebbed away, our rabbinic leadership (the usage of the word rabbi in this way didnt begin yet) we called the soferim. In part because they counted out the letters of the Torah, to insure accurate reproduction of the Torah even after the Babylonian exile. And thus they were also sofrim in the sense of writers of the seifer which contains the sipur.

But perhaps foremost, they were the ones who made halachic analysis as we know it today possible. During their era was the story of Purim, and the Jewish peoples response to it. Qiymu veqiblu haYehudim  the Jews established and accepted. Chazal, perhaps wondering about the redundancy of qiymu veqiblu, comment qiymu mah sheqiblu qevar  they established that which they had already accepted in Sinai (Megillah 7a). They gave it a spelled out analyzable basis that didnt require prophetic grounding. The concept of having short memorizable paragraphs describing established law, the notion which became the Mishnah, began.

But also because they represented a shift from being able to speak from a prophetic identification of the big picture principles to a need to reason from individual facts. Lisapeir, to tell the idea detail by detail.

Rav Chaim Brisker asked what the difference was between the obligation of zekher yetzias Mitzrayim (remembering the departure from Egypt) which is a daily experience, morning and evening, as part of Shema, and the nights obligation of sippur Yetzias Mitzrayim (see Haggadah miBeis Levi p 110). He answers that zekher requires only saying one sentence. As R Elazar ben Azaryah puts it, Behold I am like 70 years old, and I didnt merit understanding why yetzias Mitzrayim must be said  sheteiamer  at nights. Until Ben Zoma expounded it..

Sippur, however, has 4 elements:

Ideally, it should be told to another in question and answer form.
One must start the telling with genus (discussing our disgrace), and end with shevach (praise).
It must include a discussion and performance of the three mitzvos of the night: pesach, matzah, and maror.
It must tie the events to the date, the night of the 15th of Nissan, on which they are being recalled.


(These can be mapped to different sections of Maggid. See The Structure of the Seder.)

In our language, the difference is between simple amirah and sipur.

ShareThis
 


--
You are subscribed to email updates from "Aspaqlaria."
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubcribe now http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailunsub?id=4187981&key=cQD876uioH 

If you prefer to unsubscribe via postal mail, write to: Aspaqlaria, c/o FeedBurner, 549 W Randolph, Chicago IL USA 60661

This Email Delivery powered by FeedBurner.
	
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/aspaqlaria-aishdas.org/attachments/20080419/7b37ad4c/attachment-0002.htm>